Dutcher v. Owens
| Decision Date | 23 March 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. C-1473,C-1473 |
| Citation | 39 A.L.R.4th 92,647 S.W.2d 948 |
| Parties | J.A. DUTCHER, Petitioner, v. Ted OWENS, et ux., Respondents. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, Russell W. Schell, Dallas, for petitioner.
Jacobs, Taylor & Cocanower, Steven Cocanower, Fort Worth, for respondents.
This is a case of first impression concerning the allocation of liability among condominium co-owners for tort claims arising out of the ownership, use and maintenance of "common elements." The defendant was found to be vicariously liable for the homeowners' association's negligence. The trial court ordered that the plaintiffs recover from the defendant an amount based upon the defendant's proportionate ownership in the condominium project. The court of appeals reversed in part the judgment of the trial court, holding "that each unit owner, as a tenant in common with all other unit owners in the common elements, is jointly and severally liable for damage claims arising in the common elements." 635 S.W.2d 208, 211. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and affirm the trial court's judgment.
J.A. Dutcher, a resident of San Diego, California, owned a condominium apartment in the Eastridge Terrace Condominiums, located in Dallas County, which he leased to Ted and Christine Owens. Ownership of the apartment includes a 1.572% pro rata undivided ownership in the common elements of the project. The Owenses suffered substantial property loss in a fire which began in an external light fixture in a common area.
The Owenses filed suit in Tarrant County against Dutcher, the Eastridge Terrace Condominium Association, Joe Hill Electric Company, IHS-8 Ltd. (the developer) and a class of co-owners of condominiums in Eastridge Terrace represented by the officers of the homeowners' association. All defendants with the exception of Dutcher obtained a change of venue to Dallas County. The case was tried before a jury, which found the following:
(1) The fire was proximately caused by the lack of an insulating box behind the light fixture in the exterior wall air space;
(2) The homeowners' association knew of this defect;
(3) The homeowners' association alone was negligent in failing to install an insulating box with knowledge of the defect; and
(4) The negligence of homeowners' association resulted in damage to the Owens' property in the amount of $69,150.00.
The trial court rendered judgment against Dutcher on the jury's verdict in the amount of $1,087.04. The award represents the amount of damages multiplied by Dutcher's 1.572% pro rata undivided ownership in the common elements of the Eastridge Terrace Condominium project.
By an agreed statement of facts filed with the court of appeals, the parties stipulated that the sole issue for determination on appeal was whether a condominium co-owner is jointly and severally liable or is liable only for a pro rata portion of the damages. Tex.R.Civ.P. 377(d).
In enacting the Texas Condominium Act (the Act), Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1301a, the Texas Legislature intended to create "a new method of property ownership." 1 1963 Tex.Gen.Laws, Ch. 191, § 26 at 512. A condominium is an estate in real property consisting of an undivided interest in a portion of a parcel of real property together with a separate fee simple interest in another portion of the same parcel. In essence, condominium ownership is the merger of two estates in land into one: the fee simple ownership of an apartment or unit in a condominium project and a tenancy in common with other co-owners in the common elements. Scott v. Williams, 607 S.W.2d 267, 270 (Tex.Civ.App.--Texarkana 1980, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1301a; see also White v. Cox, 17 Cal.App.3d 824, 95 Cal.Rptr. 259, 45 A.L.R.3d 1161 (1971); Comment, "The Condominium and the Corporation--A Proposal for Texas," 11 Hous.L.Rev. 454 (1974).
"General common elements" consist of, inter alia, the land upon which the building stands, the "foundations, bearing walls and columns, roofs, halls, lobbies, stairways, and entrances and exits or communication ways; ... [a]ll other elements of the building desirable or rationally of common use or necessary to the existence, upkeep and safety of the condominium regime, and any other elements described in the declaration ...." Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1301a, § 2(l ), subsections (1), (2) & (7). An individual apartment cannot be conveyed separately from the undivided interest in the common elements and vice versa. Id. § 9.
A condominium regime must be established according to the Act. The declaration must be filed with the county clerk, who must record the instrument in the Condominium Records. Once the declarant has complied with the provisions of the Act, each apartment in the project is treated as an interest in real property. Id. §§ 3, 4, & 7. Administration of the regime is established by the Act. Id. §§ 13, 14 & 15.
The condominium association or council is a legislatively created unincorporated association of co-owners having as their common purpose a convenient method of ownership of real property in a statutorily created method of ownership which combines both the concepts of separateness of tenure and commonality of ownership. The California Supreme Court has concluded that "the concept of separateness in the condominium project carries over to any management body or association formed to handle the common affairs of the project, and that both the condominium project and the condominium association must be considered separate legal entities from its unit owners and association members." White v. Cox, 95 Cal.Rptr. at 262.
Given the uniqueness of the type of ownership involved in...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Riss v. Angel
...where injury resulted from conditions of the commonly held areas is pro rata rather than joint and several. E.g., Dutcher v. Owens, 647 S.W.2d 948, 39 A.L.R.4th 92 (Tex.1983). Washington has a statute providing for similar limited liability for condominium association members under such cir......
-
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. Summers
...process." Dist. of Columbia v. Heller, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 2796, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008); see also Dutcher v. Owens, 647 S.W.2d 948, 950 (Tex.1983) (discerning legislative intent from failed bills would be mere "inference" that "would involve little more than As for the legisl......
-
Cox v. Thee Evergreen Church, D-0938
...603, 605 (Tex.1975) (bailee's contributory negligence not automatically imputed to bailor). 7 Guidance is also found in Dutcher v. Owens, 647 S.W.2d 948 (Tex.1983), a case in which a question arose regarding the allocation of liability among co-owners of a condominium complex for tort claim......
-
St. Luke's Episcopal Hosp. v. Agbor
...its plain meaning or applied to cases not clearly within its purview. Smith v. Sewell, 858 S.W.2d 350, 354 (Tex.1993); Dutcher v. Owens, 647 S.W.2d 948, 951 (Tex.1983); Satterfield v. Satterfield, 448 S.W.2d 456, 459 In the 1960's, American jurisprudence began to acknowledge the hospital's ......
-
Tegman v. Accident and Medical Investigations, Inc.: the Re-modification of Modified Joint and Several Liability by Judicial Fiat
...A Major Change in Tort Law and Policy, WSTLA Trial NEWS, Dec. 1, 2003, at 39-44. 6. See infra note 81. 7. Id. 8. See Dutcher v. Owens, 647 S.W.2d 948, 950-51 (Tex. 1983); 65 C.J.S. Negligence § 154 9. In re Colo. Springs Air Crash, 867 F. Supp. 630, 634 (N.D. 111. 1994). 10. 199 P.2d 1 (Cal......
-
CHAPTER 16 EXAMINATION OF TRACTS WITHIN TOWNSITES
...owner is same as pooling clause). [200] See, e.g., Tex. Prop. Code Ann. §§ 82.001 to 82.164 (LexisNexis 2013). [201] Butcher v. Owens, 647 S.W.2d 948 (Tex. 1983) (holding that condominium owner's tort liability for fire damage to common areas was limited to his pro rata undivided interest i......