Dwelling House Ins. Co. v. Brewster
Decision Date | 17 January 1895 |
Citation | 61 N.W. 746,43 Neb. 528 |
Parties | DWELLING HOUSE INS. CO. v. BREWSTER. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Syllabus by the Court.
1. In a reply, certain matters were alleged, which it was claimed constituted either waivers, estoppel, or avoidance of the effect of matters of defense contained in the allegations of an answer to which they were respectively directed and applied. The reply also contained a general denial of each and every allegation of the answer. Held, that any allegations of the answer to which the reply pleaded a waiver, an estoppel, or matter to avoid its effect must be treated as admitted.
2. In stating the case to the jury in its instructions the court should clearly outline the issues as presented by the pleadings, and should not inform them that facts which are admitted are denied.
3. An instruction which, as to certain of the issues in the case on trial, placed the burden of proof upon the wrong party, or one upon whom, under the conditions of the questions to be tried as presented by the pleadings, such burden did not rest, and where the evidence adduced, relating to such issues, was conflicting, held, to be erroneous and misleading and prejudicial to the rights of such party, and not to fairly submit the issues to the jury, and to call for a reversal of the judgment.
4. Proofs of loss required by a condition of an insurance policy are waived when the insurance company denies any liability for the loss on the ground that the policy was not in force at the date of the loss.
Error to district court, Lancaster county; Hall, Judge.
Action by George W. Brewster against the Dwelling House Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error. Reversed.Cornish & Lamb, for plaintiff in error.
A. Norman and Marquett, Deweese & Hall, for defendant in error.
The defendant in error commenced this action in the district court of Lancaster county, alleging, in substance, in his petition, that on August 9, 1886, he was the owner of a dwelling house in Brewster, Blaine county, and the insurance company (plaintiff in error), in consideration of the sum of $40, issued and delivered to him, of the above date, a policy of insurance insuring the above building against loss or damage by fire in the sum of $1,000 during a term of five years; that on the 2d day of December, 1887, the building so insured was wholly destroyed by fire, and on or about the 6th day of December, 1887, he gave the insurance company due notice and proof of the fire and loss, “and has duly performed on his part all the conditions of said policy of insurance”; that the building was of the value of $1,000 at the time of its destruction by fire; that payment of the loss has been demanded by the insured of the company, but such payment has never been made.
The company filed an answer, which was as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dezell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
...Neb. 1, 58 N. W. 597; Omaha Fire Ins. Co. v. Dierks, 43 Neb. 473, 61 N. W. 740; Id., 43 Neb. 569, 61 N. W. 745; Dwelling House Ins. Co. v. Brewster, 43 Neb. 528, 61 N. W. 746; German Ins. & Savings Institution v. Kline, 44 Neb. 395, 62 N. W. 857; Home Fire Ins. Co. v. Hammang, 44 Neb. 566, ......
-
Aetna Insurance Co. v. Simmons
... ... The real property consisted ... of a frame dwelling and additions thereto insured for $ 500, ... a barn insured for $ 300, d a milk house insured for $ 50 ... The general verdict of the jury fixed the value of ... part of the insured or his assigns. In Home Fire Ins. Co ... v. Bean , 42 Neb. 537, 60 N.W. 907, it was ruled: ... "Where ... loss. In Dwelling-House Ins. Co. v. Brewster , 43 ... Neb. 528, 61 N.W. 746, it was held [49 Neb. 820] that proofs ... ...
-
Aetna Ins. Co. v. Simmons
...that the policy was void from its inception. If this was a fact, then there was no necessity for proofs of loss. In Insurance Co. v. Brewster, 43 Neb. 528, 61 N. W. 746, it was held that “proofs of loss required by a condition of an insurance policy are waived when the insurance company den......
-
Omaha Fire Ins. Co. v. Hildebrand
...Richardson, 40 Neb. 1, 58 N. W. 597;Insurance Co. v. Dierks, 43 Neb. 473, 61 N. W. 740;Id., 43 Neb. 569, 61 N. W. 745;Insurance Co. v. Brewster, 43 Neb. 528, 61 N. W. 746;Institution v. Kline, 44 Neb. 395, 62 N. W. 857;Insurance Co. v. Hammang, 44 Neb. 566, 62 N. W. 883;Rochester Loan & Ban......