Eady v. State

Citation369 So.2d 843
PartiesIn re William EADY v. STATE of Alabama. Ex parte State of Alabama, ex rel. Attorney General. 78-316.
Decision Date20 April 1979
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals, 369 So.2d 841.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the state, petitioner.

John M. Gruenewald, Dothan, for respondent.

TORBERT, Chief Justice.

We deny the writ because there was no proof to show the petitioner escaped from "the custody of the Sheriff of Houston County, Alabama, Who had him in charge under authority of law . . . ." (emphasis added) as charged in the indictment. There is no conflict with Jenkins v. State, 367 So.2d 587 (Ala.Cr.App.), Cert. denied, 367 So.2d 590 (Ala.1979).

WRIT DENIED.

BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Andrews v. State, 7 Div. 294
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 14, 1985
    ...of "custody" as defined in the statute. Appellant cites three cases, Eady v. State, 369 So.2d 841 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 369 So.2d 843 (Ala.1979); Gibson v. State, 48 Ala.App. 237, 263 So.2d 694 (1972); Artrip v. State, 41 Ala.App. 492, 136 So.2d 574 (1962); and to support his conte......
  • Ex parte Dietz
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • May 10, 1985
    ...the elements of the crime of escape. Lawful custody is one such element. Eady v. State, 369 So.2d 841 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 369 So.2d 843 (Ala.1979); Phelps v. State, 416 So.2d 766 (Ala.Crim.App.1982); Pinkard v. State, 405 So.2d 411 (Ala.Crim.App.1981). The State did not prove law......
  • Grantham v. State, 4 Div. 769
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • August 18, 1987
    ...expressly overruled Grimes v. State, 402 So.2d 1094 (Ala.Cr.App.1981), and Eady v. State, 369 So.2d 841 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 369 So.2d 843 (Ala.1979). However, in Ex parte Alexander, supra, the Supreme Court of Alabama held that this new interpretation of the escape statutes could n......
  • Alexander v. State, 8 Div. 166
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 23, 1984
    ...simply failed to return to custody." Grimes, 402 So.2d at 1096. See also Eady v. State, 369 So.2d 841 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 369 So.2d 843 (Ala.1979). On reconsideration of the meaning and scope of the statutory definition of "custody", we find that the crime of escape in the first de......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT