Early-Foster Co. v. W. F. Klump & Co.
Decision Date | 19 January 1921 |
Docket Number | (No. 6237.) |
Parties | EARLY-FOSTER CO. v. W. F. KLUMP & CO. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, McLennan County; Erwin J. Clark, Judge.
Action by Early-Foster Company against W. F. Klump & Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Tom L. McCullough, of Dallas, and J. N. Gallagher, of Waco, for appellant.
O. L. Stribling, of Waco, for appellee.
Early-Foster Company, a corporation, sued W. F. Klump, doing business under the firm name of W. F. Klump & Co., to recover an alleged balance of about $1,200, claimed to be due for the price of 2,000 bales of cotton linters sold by appellant to appellee, under contracts dated December 1 and December 7, 1916. Appellee denied liability, and specially answered that he had fully paid the amount due on the contracts, alleging that such payments were made upon drafts drawn by appellant with bills of lading attached through banks in New Orleans, aggregating the sum of about $70,000; that the banks, acting for appellant in the collection of the drafts, accepted this sum in full payment of the amount due by appellee on account of the purchase and sale of the linters; that, upon the payment of this amount, the New Orleans banks delivered the bills of lading and drafts to appellee, and canceled and marked paid the drafts, and that thereafter the appellant, in due course of business, received and accepted the sum so paid in full payment and settlement of appellee's indebtedness, with full knowledge that the sum paid by appellee was in full of the contract. It was further pleaded by appellee that there was a dispute as to the correct amount due, and especially as to certain items making up the sum total of the drafts, which were claimed to be overcharges, but which were authorized by appellant to be deducted from the face of the drafts, and that the acceptance of the balance, and the other facts alleged, constituted a full and complete accord and satisfaction. At the conclusion of plaintiff's testimony, the trial court instructed a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was rendered for appellee.
The contracts in question were effected by interchange of telegrams, the linters being sold at a fixed price per pound, f. o. b. Texas common points. The cotton was shipped in due course, and the drafts with bills of lading attached were drawn and sent to New Orleans banks, where appellee was doing business. A controversy arose over certain items included in the amount of the drafts, with relation to certain charges which were claimed by appellee to be unauthorized by the contract, and illegal and excessive demands.
The telegrams and letters, relating to appellee's demands for deductions and appellant's allowance of the same, are as follows:
On December 19, 1916, and after the drafts had been paid by appellee, appellant brought its suit for the alleged balance, and attached certain linters claimed to belong to appellee at Waco, Tex.
Appella...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Coffman
...must be left to the determination of the jury." Chief Justice Key, speaking for the Third Court of Civil Appeals in Early-Foster Co. v. Klump, 229 S. W. 1015, 1023, "So, in the present case, as in the case cited [Texas Life Ins. Co. v. Legg (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 587, 588], there was no......
-
Wiggins v. Holmes
...should be left to the jury for determination. Stooksbury v. Swan, 85 Tex. 563, 571, 22 S. W. 963; Early-Foster Co. v. W. F. Klump & Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 1015, pages 1019, 1023; Texas Life Ins. Co. v. Legg (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 587; Boone v. City of Stephenville, 37 S.W.(2d) 8......
-
Frazier v. Ray.
...220 Ill. 106, 77 N. E. 110; Partridge Lumber Co. v. Phelps-Burruss Lumber & Coal Co., 91 Neb. 396, 136 N. W. 65; Early-Foster Co. v. Klump & Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 1015; Sylva Supply Co. v. Watt, 181 N. C. 432, 107 S. E. 451. [4] To avoid the effect of the above-declared rule, the a......
-
Boone v. City of Stephenville
...have been permitted to draw the inference. Stooksbury v. Swan, 85 Tex. 563, 571, 573, 22 S. W. 963, 966; Early-Foster Co. v. W. F. Klump & Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 1015, 1023. As to the adverse claim of Dr. Gordon, there was evidence that at the time the appellant Boone bought his lot......