Early v. State, 87-956
| Citation | 516 So.2d 24,12 Fla. L. Weekly 2640 |
| Decision Date | 17 November 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 87-956,87-956 |
| Parties | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2640 Henry James EARLY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, Feiler & Feiler and Milton Hirsch, Sp. Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Margarita Muina Febres, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
This is an appeal by the defendant Henry James Early from a denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.800(a). We reverse based on the following briefly stated legal analysis.
First, the defendant Early was sentenced to thirty years imprisonment for armed robbery, which sentence was an improper departure from the sentencing guidelines range of nine to twelve years imprisonment. The reasons given by the trial court for departing from the guidelines were that (1) the defendant was a habitual offender under Section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1985), an admittedly invalid ground for a sentencing guidelines departure, Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986), and (2) the victim suffered psychological trauma, also an invalid ground absent proof--and there was none in this case--that the trauma suffered was greater than that ordinarily suffered by the victim of a robbery. Lumpkin v. State, 510 So.2d 1164, 1165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); see State v. Rousseau, 509 So.2d 281, 283-85 (Fla.1987).
Second, an unlawful sentencing guidelines departure sentence, as here, may be corrected either upon a post-conviction motion to correct sentence under Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.800(a) or a post-conviction motion to vacate sentence under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. Watkins v. State, 498 So.2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); contra Lowe v. State, 501 So.2d 712 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Carter v. State, 491 So.2d 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Wahl v. State, 460 So.2d 579 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
We, accordingly, reverse the order under review and remand the cause to the trial court with directions to set aside the unlawful thirty-year sentence imposed on the defendant and to resentence the defendant within the sentencing guidelines range of nine to twelve years imprisonment.
Reversed and remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Johnson v. State
...Id. at 966 (emphasis added). The appealability of rule 3.800(a) denials finds additional support in the following cases: Early v. State, 516 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Orsi v. State, 515 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Dupont v. State, 514 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Schneider v. State, ......
-
Harvard v. State, 94-193
...for departure, obvious on the face of the record, constitute fundamental error which may be raised at any time. In Early v. State, 516 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), this court, recognizing that there was conflict between the districts, held that a defendant may raise, for the first time by r......
-
Moses v. State, 87-2110
...2d DCA 1987); Rowe v. State, 496 So.2d 857 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Wahl v. State, 460 So.2d 579 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). But see Early v. State, 516 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Watkins v. State, 498 So.2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), appeal after remand, 531 So.2d 239 (Fla. 3d DCA AFFIRMED. COWART and D......
-
Deese v. State, 87-1703
...of appeal have ruled a motion filed under rule 3.800(a) may be used to correct an unlawful guidelines sentence. In Early v. State, 516 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), the defendant was given a departure sentence based on habitual offender status and psychological trauma to the victim. The defe......