Easley v. Easley
| Decision Date | 06 January 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 31686,31686 |
| Citation | 238 Ga. 180,231 S.E.2d 763 |
| Parties | Fannie Daniels EASLEY v. Troy Lee EASLEY. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Guy B. Scott, Jr., Athens, for appellant.
Tom M. Strickland, Athens, for appellee.
1. The former husband filed a 'complaint' praying that the former wife be held in contempt for depriving him of his child visitation rights. The trial judge did not err in treating the 'complaint' as a motion for contempt citation filed in the divorce case. Code Ann. § 81A-108(f).
2. There is evidence to support the court's decision and thus the trial judge did not err in finding the former wife in contempt.
3. After finding the former wife to be in wilful contempt of court, the trial court entered an unconditional order that she spend two specified weekends in jail. The order finding the wife in contempt shows by its caption, content and purpose that it is a civil contempt order. For the differences between civil and criminal contempt orders, see Gompers v. Buck's Stove & Range Co., 221 U.S. 418, 31 S.Ct. 492, 55 L.Ed. 797 (1911); Penfield Co. v. S. E. C., 330 U.S. 585, 67 S.Ct. 918, 91 L.Ed. 1117 (1947). Civil contempt orders imposing a sentence to jail for violation of visitation rights should be conditioned upon compliance. Stanton v. Stanton, 223 Ga. 664, 668, 157 S.E.2d 453 (1967). See also Goetz v. Goetz, 181 Kan. 128, 309 P.2d 655 (1957). Upon remand, the trial court is directed to modify its contempt order so as to make the wife's confinement in jail conditional upon her noncompliance with the order of the court.
Judgment affirmed with direction.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Thedieck v. Thedieck
...orders imposing a sentence to jail for violation of visitation rights should be conditioned upon compliance. Easley v. Easley, 238 Ga. 180, 181, 231 S.E.2d 763 (1977)." (Punctuation omitted.) Phillips v. Tittle, 261 Ga. 820, 821, 411 S.E.2d 871 In Ensley v. Ensley, supra, 239 Ga. 860, 238 S......
-
Stanford v. Pogue
...,12 the trial court was required to impose a conditional sentence for civil contempt, the Supreme Court of Georgia has rejected this argument.Easley ... did not hold that a court was precluded from subjecting a party to criminal contempt for failure to abide by the visitation provisions of ......
-
Edwards v. Edwards
...to vacate that order, Maxwell countered that she was "ready and willing to permit the visitation per the Bahamian Order." Relying upon Easley v. Easley,7 she argued that her willingness to abide by the Bahamian order brought her substantially into compliance with the trial court's Maxwell c......
-
Ensley v. Ensley
...has been frequently stated, Cobb v. Black, 34 Ga. 162(2) (1865); Davis v. Davis, 138 Ga. 8(1), 74 S.E. 830 (1912); Easley v. Easley, 238 Ga. 180(3), 231 S.E.2d 763 (1977), and almost as frequently overlooked, e. g., McCullough v. McCullough, 208 Ga. 776, 778-779, 69 S.E.2d 764 (1952). Suffi......