Easley v. Elliott
| Decision Date | 28 February 1869 |
| Citation | Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289 (Mo. 1869) |
| Parties | GEO. W. EASLEY, Respondent, v. WM. H. ELLIOTT, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Fourth District Court.
Burgess, for appellant.
Easley, for respondent.
The case was tried by consent of parties before the court, without the intervention of a jury. The court found a verdict for plaintiff, and rendered judgment thereon. No instructions or declarations of law were asked for or given on either side. There is no question of law presented or saved in a manner which this court can review, and we will not undertake to weigh the evidence to determine whether it justified the finding of the trial court.
Judgment affirmed.
The other judges concur.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
47 cases
-
In re Lankford's Estate
...conclusive upon the appellate court, regardless of whether there was any evidence whatever in the record to support such finding. Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289; Wilson v. Railroad, 46 Mo. 36; Wielandy v. Lemuel, 47 Mo. 322; Hamilton v. Boggess, 63 Mo. 251. But by the present rule, which is ......
-
In re Assessment of Collateral Inheritance Tax In Estate of Lankford
...conclusive upon the appellate court, regardless of whether there was any evidence whatever in the record to support such finding. [Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289; v. Railroad, 46 Mo. 36; Weilandy v. Lemuel, 47 Mo. 322; Hamilton v. Boggess, 63 Mo. 233.] But by the present rule, which is well-......
-
Newell v. St. Louis Bolt & Iron Co.
...v. Riddlesburger, 29 Mo. 341; McLean, Admr., v. Bragg, 30 Mo. 262; McCune v. Erfort, 43 Mo. 134; Faugman v. Hersey, 43 Mo. 122; Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289; Jaccard v. Davis, 43 Mo. 535; Allen's Administrator v. Richmond, 41 Mo. 302; Blumenthal v. Torlina, 40 Mo. 159; Longuemare v. Busby,......
-
Bird v. Sellers
... ... whether the evidence was sufficient to support the finding ... Alton v. Arnold, 27 Mo.App. 264; Easley v ... Elliott, 43 Mo. 289; Harbison v. School ... District, 89 Mo. 184; Mead v. Spaulding, 94 Mo ... 43; Krider v. Milner, 99 Mo. 145; ... ...
Get Started for Free