Easley v. Elliott

Decision Date28 February 1869
PartiesGEO. W. EASLEY, Respondent, v. WM. H. ELLIOTT, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Fourth District Court.

Burgess, for appellant.

Easley, for respondent.

WAGNER, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

The case was tried by consent of parties before the court, without the intervention of a jury. The court found a verdict for plaintiff, and rendered judgment thereon. No instructions or declarations of law were asked for or given on either side. There is no question of law presented or saved in a manner which this court can review, and we will not undertake to weigh the evidence to determine whether it justified the finding of the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
47 cases
  • In re Lankford's Estate
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 16, 1917
    ...conclusive upon the appellate court, regardless of whether there was any evidence whatever in the record to support such finding. Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289; Wilson v. Railroad, 46 Mo. 36; Wielandy v. Lemuel, 47 Mo. 322; Hamilton v. Boggess, 63 Mo. 251. But by the present rule, which is ......
  • In re Assessment of Collateral Inheritance Tax In Estate of Lankford
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 27, 1917
    ...conclusive upon the appellate court, regardless of whether there was any evidence whatever in the record to support such finding. [Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289; v. Railroad, 46 Mo. 36; Weilandy v. Lemuel, 47 Mo. 322; Hamilton v. Boggess, 63 Mo. 233.] But by the present rule, which is well-......
  • Newell v. St. Louis Bolt & Iron Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • February 5, 1878
    ...v. Riddlesburger, 29 Mo. 341; McLean, Admr., v. Bragg, 30 Mo. 262; McCune v. Erfort, 43 Mo. 134; Faugman v. Hersey, 43 Mo. 122; Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289; Jaccard v. Davis, 43 Mo. 535; Allen's Administrator v. Richmond, 41 Mo. 302; Blumenthal v. Torlina, 40 Mo. 159; Longuemare v. Busby,......
  • Bird v. Sellers
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • January 31, 1893
    ...except the question as to whether the evidence was sufficient to support the finding. Alton v. Arnold, 27 Mo.App. 264; Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289; Harbison v. School District, 89 Mo. 184; Mead v. Spaulding, 94 Mo. 43; Krider v. Milner, 99 Mo. 145; Gaty v. Clark, 28 Mo.App. 332. (7) The t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT