Eastern Texas Electric Co. v. Reagan
Citation | 228 S.W. 366 |
Decision Date | 12 February 1921 |
Docket Number | (No. 650.) |
Parties | EASTERN TEXAS ELECTRIC CO. v. REAGAN. |
Court | Court of Appeals of Texas |
Appeal from Jefferson County Court; D. P. Wheat, Judge.
Action by C. H. Reagan against the Eastern Texas Electric Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed, subject to filing of remittitur.
Orgain & Carroll, of Beaumont, for appellant.
C. W. Howth, of Beaumont, for appellee.
Appellee's motion to dismiss this appeal for the failure of appellant to file its brief herein within the time provided by law is denied. This cause was filed in this court on the 7th day of September, 1920. Appellant filed its brief with the clerk on the 6th day of January, and this cause was submitted before us on the 3d instant. Appellee filed this motion to dismiss on the 13th of January, and on the same day filed his brief. The statement of facts in this case consists of seven typewritten pages. Appellant's brief contains nine typewritten pages. It does not appear that appellee has suffered injury by the failure of appellant to file its brief within the time provided by article 2115, R. C. S., but rather it affirmatively appears he was not injured. S. A. & A. P. Railway Co. v. Holden, 93 Tex. 211, 54 S. W. 751; I. & G. N. Ry. Co. v. Walters, 161 S. W. 916; Danner v. Walker-Smith Co., 154 S. W. 295; Railway Co. v. Wood Bros., 147 S. W. 283.
Appellee's cause of action is based on the following facts: On the evening of the 10th of December, 1919, he went from Beaumont to Nederland as a passenger on one of defendant's interurban cars, operating between Beaumont and Port Arthur. Nederland is 10 or 12 miles from Beaumont. His purpose was to call on a young lady living a short distance from Nederland. He was driven out to her home by a jitney driver, with whom he left directions to call for him in time for the last Beaumont car, which passed through Nederland about 12:30 a. m. The driver called for him, but before getting him to the station the car broke down, and appellee walked a few blocks to the station. Under the facts, appellant was guilty of negligence in not stopping its car for appellee. He then walked from Nederland to Beaumont, without making any effort to secure lodging at Nederland. This was a small town, but contained a hotel, which was usually crowded, and was crowded that night. Because of the bad condition of the dirt road, he could not have reached Beaumont that way. Appellee testified:
Under the charge of the court plaintiff recovered damages for the injury received by him in his walk to Beaumont that night. On the facts of this record we sustain appellant's assignment that such damages as suffered by appellee were not within the contemplation of the parties, and that he was guilty of contributory negligence in undertaking this walk....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Simpson
...an appeal will not ordinarily be dismissed when it affirmatively appears that appellee was not injured thereby. E. Tex. Electric Co. v. Reagan (Tex. Civ. App.) 228 S. W. 366. Appellee does not ask a dismissal of the appeal, but a dismissal of the brief. In such a case we are required, becau......