Eastley v. Volkman, 2011-0606
| Decision Date | 04 September 2012 |
| Docket Number | 2011-0606 |
| Citation | 2012 Ohio 3997,2012 Ohio 2179,132 Ohio St.3d 328 |
| Parties | Eastley v. Volkman |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
The official versions of the opinions listed below, which were previously released as slip opinions, have been published in the September 3, 2012 Ohio Official Reports advance sheet. These opinions should now be cited using the Ohio Official Reports citation format.
To continue reading
Request your trial
10 cases
-
Woods v. Bureau of Workers' Comp., 26561.
...disc herniation. As we previously noted, that is an incorrect view of the required evidence. {¶ 64} In Eastley v. Volkman, 132 Ohio St.3d 328, 2012 Ohio 2179, 972 N.E.2d 517, the Supreme Court of Ohio concluded that the manifest weight standards outlined in State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d......
-
State v. Borger
...¶ 20 (10th Dist.). A manifest-weight argument "refers to a greater amount of credible evidence and relates to persuasion." Eastley v. Volkman, 132 Ohio St.3d 328, 2012-Ohio-2179, 972 N.E.2d 517, ¶ 19. This court sits as the 13th juror, weighing the evidence and considering the credibility o......
-
State v. Black, Appellate Case No. 27888
...asks which of the competing inferences suggested by the evidence is more believable or persuasive." Wilson at ¶ 12; see Eastley v. Volkman, 132 Ohio St.3d 328, 2012-Ohio-2179, 972 N.E.2d 517, ¶ 19. When evaluating whether a conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence, the appe......
-
Donohoo v. Donohoo, CASE NO. CA2011-11-080
...the standard for reviewing whether a trial court's decision in a civil matter is supported by the manifest weight. Eastley v. Volkman, 132 Ohio St.3d 328, 2012-Ohio-2179.Weight of the evidence concerns "the inclination of the greater amount of credible evidence, offered in a trial, to suppo......
Request a trial to view additional results