Ebersole v. Rankin
Citation | 13 S.W. 756 |
Parties | EBERSOLE et al. v. RANKIN. |
Decision Date | 19 May 1890 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
Appeal from circuit court, Atchison county; H. D. KELLEY, Judge.
Keeley, Craig & Kelley, for appellants. A. M. Hough, M. McKillop, and John D. Campbell, for respondent.
Our statute (section 3773, Rev. St. 1879) requires that "each party shall * * * make out and furnish the court with a clear and concise statement of the case," etc. There is not the semblance of a statement in this cause by either party. We do not propose to go through this record, or the abstracts thereof, and prepare a statement of the facts. Long v. Long, 96 Mo. 180, 8 S. W. Rep. 766; Craig v. Scudder, 98 Mo. 664, 12 S. W. Rep. 341; Jayne v. Wine, 98 Mo. 404, 11 S. W. Rep. 969; Manufacturers' Sav. Bank v. Big Muddy Iron Co., 97 Mo. 38, 10 S. W. Rep. 865. As the statute has not been complied with, we shall dismiss the appeal. All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hannerty v. The Standard Theater Company
... ... (1) The ... judgment ought to be affirmed because of non-compliance with ... the rules on the part of the appellant. Ebersole v ... Rankin, 13 S.W. 756; Coleman v. Farrar, 14 S.W ... 825. (2) Although this is a proceeding in equity, yet this ... court will be influenced ... ...
- Murphy v. De France