Ebersole v. Rankin

Citation13 S.W. 756
PartiesEBERSOLE et al. v. RANKIN.
Decision Date19 May 1890
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Missouri

Appeal from circuit court, Atchison county; H. D. KELLEY, Judge.

Keeley, Craig & Kelley, for appellants. A. M. Hough, M. McKillop, and John D. Campbell, for respondent.

SHERWOOD, J.

Our statute (section 3773, Rev. St. 1879) requires that "each party shall * * * make out and furnish the court with a clear and concise statement of the case," etc. There is not the semblance of a statement in this cause by either party. We do not propose to go through this record, or the abstracts thereof, and prepare a statement of the facts. Long v. Long, 96 Mo. 180, 8 S. W. Rep. 766; Craig v. Scudder, 98 Mo. 664, 12 S. W. Rep. 341; Jayne v. Wine, 98 Mo. 404, 11 S. W. Rep. 969; Manufacturers' Sav. Bank v. Big Muddy Iron Co., 97 Mo. 38, 10 S. W. Rep. 865. As the statute has not been complied with, we shall dismiss the appeal. All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Hannerty v. The Standard Theater Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 28, 1892
    ... ...          (1) The ... judgment ought to be affirmed because of non-compliance with ... the rules on the part of the appellant. Ebersole v ... Rankin, 13 S.W. 756; Coleman v. Farrar, 14 S.W ... 825. (2) Although this is a proceeding in equity, yet this ... court will be influenced ... ...
  • Murphy v. De France
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 19, 1890

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT