Eccles v. R.I. Hosp. Trust Co.
Decision Date | 27 June 1916 |
Citation | 98 A. 129 |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Parties | ECCLES v. RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL TRUST CO. et al. |
Case Reserved from Superior Court, New London County; Milton A. Shumway, Judge.
Application by the Rhode Island Hospital Trust Company and the United Workers of Norwich, a Connecticut corporation, for the appointment of the United Workers of Norwich as trustee to receive and hold bequests made by the will of John Eccles to the Rock Nook Home for Children. From a decree and order of the court of probate, appointing the United Workers as trustee, William B. Eccles, heir at law of testator, appealed to the superior court, which reserved the case for the advice of the Supreme Court of Errors upon an agreed statement of facts. Superior court advised to enter judgment affirming the decree of the court of probate.
Appeal from the decree and order of the court of probate for the district of Norwich, appointing the United Workers of Norwich, a Connecticut corporation, as trustee to receive and hold certain bequests made by the will of John Eccles to the Rock Nook Home for Children, brought to the superior court for New London county and reserved for the advice of this court upon an agreed statement of facts. John Eccles, late of Norwich, died testate, leaving a considerable estate. By the thirteenth clause of his will he made the following bequests, among others:
Since that time the United Workers has maintained and operated the Rock Nook Children's Home in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Pierce deed, and has received various gifts for the benefit of the home, and the same has been practically maintained out of the income from invested funds given for that special purpose and separately accounted for on the books of the United Workers. The management of the home has been entirely in the hands of a standing committee for the Rock Nook Children's Home which, under the constitution of the United Workers, has power to elect its own members subject to the approval of the executive committee. John Eccles, through his contributions, was a member of the corporation of the United Workers, but never held office in it or served on its committees. He was often consulted by individual members of the standing committee for the Rock Nook Children's Home, and consulted with them as to finding places in the home for children who resided in the districts with which he was especially familiar. He was never inside of the home, but took great interest in the work carried on there. He did not know that it was a branch of the work of the United Workers. On the application of the Rhode Island Hospital Trust Company and the United Workers, the probate court for the district of Norwich appointed the United Workers as trustee to receive and hold the bequests to the Rock Nook Home for Children, described in the will as a corporation located in the town of Norwich. From this decree the brother and sole heir at law of the testator, who received by the will a small pecuniary legacy, appeals.
Hadlai A. Hull, of New London, Charles Welles Gross, of Hartford, and William H. Shields, Jr., and William H. Shields, both of Norwich, for plaintiff. James C. Collins, of Providence, and Arthur M. Brown, of Norwich, for defendant executor. John P. Huntington, of Norwich, for defendant United Workers of Norwich.
BEACH, J. (after stating the facts as above). It is apparent, from the terms of the will interpreted in the light of the agreed statement of surrounding facts, that the testator intended these bequests for the institution known to him as the Rock Nook Home for Children, located in Norwich, in whose work he was greatly interested. This is not seriously disputed.
It is pointed out, however, by the appellant that since this action is an appeal from a decree of probate appointing a trustee, the only questions properly before us are whether, by the terms of these bequests, a trust is created, and, if so, whether the probate court had power, under the circumstances, to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Town of Winchester v. Cox
...perpetual maintenance of this use is required by the statute of charitable uses. General Statutes, § 5000; Eccles v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co., 90 Conn. 592, 598, 98 A. 129. Apart from the statute, the town, by accepting the conveyances, became bound to observe the provisions in them ......
-
Mitchell v. Reeves
... ... for defendant Hartford Nat. Bank & Trust Co., trustee ... Richard F. Corkey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ... Connecticut Hospital. In Eccles v. Rhode Island Hospital ... Trust Co., 90 Conn. 592, at page 600, 98 A ... ...
-
Culver v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.
... ... of a legacy in Tappan's Appeal, 52 Conn. 412, and in ... Eccles v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co., 90 Conn ... 592, 600, 98 A. 129. In Bell v. Raymond, 20 Conn ... ...
-
Ministers & Missionaries Ben. Bd. of Am. Baptist Convention v. Meriden Trust & Safe Deposit Co.
...School Ass'n v. Alling, 113 Conn. 200, 203, 154 A. 439; Dwyer v. Leonard, 100 Conn. 513, 517, 124 A. 28; Eccles v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co., 90 Conn. 592, 599, 98 A. 129; Shepard v. Shepard, 57 Conn. 24, 27, 17 A. 173. The distinction to be drawn is between provisions in an extrinsic......