Eccleston v. State, 97-2876

Decision Date06 February 1998
Docket NumberNo. 97-2876,97-2876
Citation706 So.2d 368
Parties23 Fla. L. Weekly D433 Patrick D. ECCLESTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County; L. Haldane Taylor, Judge.

Patrick D. Eccleston, Appellant, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which his motions for post conviction relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, were summarily denied. We are constrained by the Florida Supreme Court's decision in State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996), to reverse the trial judge's order because the record attached to it, which includes the written plea agreements and the transcript of the plea hearing, does not conclusively refute the appellant's allegations that his pleas were induced by misinformation from his trial counsel regarding the amount of time he would actually serve and whether he would be eligible for gain time and controlled release programs.

The order of summary denial is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing with regard to the allegations that the appellant's guilty pleas were induced by erroneous advice of counsel.

BARFIELD, C.J., JOANOS, J., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Brazeail v. State, 1D02-0763.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 9, 2002
    ...So.2d 701 (Fla.1977); State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996); Banks v. State, 136 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962); Eccleston v. State, 706 So.2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). These decisions were not founded on a theory of ineffectiveness of counsel. Indeed, all but Leroux and Eccleston were dec......
  • State v. Yeomans
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 3, 2015
    ...So.2d 701 (Fla.1977) ; State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996) ; Banks v. State, 136 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962) ; Eccleston v. State, 706 So.2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). These decisions were not founded on a theory of ineffectiveness of counsel.... The issue under the Florida decisions i......
  • Clemmons v. State, 1D05-3965.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 26, 2006
    ...1st DCA Feb.15, 2005), rev. pending, No. SC05-0516; Brazeail v. State, 821 So.2d 364, 366-68 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Eccleston v. State, 706 So.2d 368, 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We, therefore, reverse the summary denial of the appellant's claim for ineffective assistance of counsel and remand t......
  • Romero v. State, 98-3374.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 30, 1999
    ...misadvice of counsel regarding the amount of time the defendant would actually serve on the sentence imposed); Eccleston v. State, 706 So.2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Ripley v. State, 706 So.2d 406 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Accordingly, the order of summary denial is reversed, and we remand the c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT