Echols v. State

Decision Date27 October 1899
Citation34 S.E. 289,110 Ga. 257
PartiesECHOLS v. STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

1. On the trial of one indicted for using opprobrious words it is for the jury to determine whether or not there was provocation sufficient to excuse their use. Collins v. State, 78 Ga. 88; Williams v. State, 31 S.E. 738, 105 Ga. 608, and citations.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Error from city court, Gwinnett county; Sam J. Winn, Judge.

Love Echols was convicted of using opprobrious words, and brings error. Affirmed.

R. W. Peeples and Oscar Brown, for plaintiff in error.

F. F. Juhan, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT