Eckles v. State
Decision Date | 28 April 1938 |
Parties | ECKLES v. STATE. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Error to Criminal Court of Record, Dade County; Ben C. Willard Judge.
James Eckles was sentenced to the State Penitentiary on his plea of guilty of breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit a felony, and he brings error.
Reversed and remanded.
Pine & Giblin and Vincent C. Giblin, all of Miami for plaintiff in error.
Cary D Landis, Atty. Gen., and Tyrus A. Norwood, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Upon an information filed March 24, 1936, charging the statutory offense of breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit a felony, the accused in open court on the day the information was filed, and without being represented by counsel, was arraigned and pleaded guilty to the information. On April 1, 1936, counsel appeared with the accused in open court and by motion suggested the insanity of the accused 'at the time of the alleged crime and at the present time,' and moved for permission to withdraw the plea of guilty and to substitute therefor a plea of not guilty, that the suggestion of insanity be tried by a jury, and that the trial of the issue of guilt be deferred until a determination of the issue of insanity. An affidavit of the mother of the accused was presented in support of the suggestion that the accused is insane. No counter affidavits or other proofs were offered by the prosecuting attorney in opposition to the motion. The motion was denied and exception noted. Sentence was deferred by the court.
On April 17, 1936, counsel for the accused presented the following motion:
The affidavits referred to in the motion tended in some degree to support the motion.
The motion was denied and an exception was noted. Motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment were made and denied and exceptions noted.
The accused was sentenced to the State Penitentiary for a term of three years. Writ of error was taken.
'In a criminal prosecution, a defendant has a right to plead guilty; and the effect of such a plea is to authorize the imposition of the sentence prescribed by law upon a verdict of guilty of the crime sufficiently charged in the indictment or information.
'A plea of guilty should be entirely voluntary by one competent to know the consequences. * * *
'While the trial court may exercise discretion in permitting or refusing to permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn for the purpose of pleading not guilty, yet such discretion is subject to review by an appellate court.
'A defendant should be permitted to withdraw a plea of guilty given unadvisedly when application...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Braverman
...since the policy of the law is partial to a trial on the merits. Canada v. State, 144 Fla. 633, 198 So. 220 (1940); Eckles v. State, 132 Fla. 526, 180 So. 764 (1938); Pope v. State, 56 Fla. 81, 47 So. 487 (1908); Banks v. State, 136 So.2d 25 (Fla.1st DCA 1962). The exercise of this discreti......
-
Reyes v. Kelly
...State. Canada v. State, 1940, 144 Fla. 633, 198 So. 220; Pope v. State, 1908, 56 Fla. 81, 47 So. 487, 16 Ann.Cas. 972; Eckles v. State, 1938, 132 Fla. 526, 180 So. 764. Also, a conviction or acquittal of a lesser offense would bar a subsequent prosecution for a greater offense in all those ......
-
Rubenstein v. State
...Fla. 592, 109 So. 627; Nickels v. State, 86 Fla. 208, 98 So. 497, 502, 99 So. 121; Casey v. State, 116 Fla. 3, 156 So. 282; Eckles v. State, 132 Fla. 526, 180 So. 764; Sinclari v. State, 133 Fla. 77, 182 So. 637; Artigas v. State, 140 Fla. 671, 192 So. 795; Wenrich v. State, 159 Fla. 492, 3......
-
Jordan v. State, 647
...Fla. 592, 109 So. 627; Nickels v. State, 86 Fla. 208, 95 So. 497, 502, 99 So. 121; Casey v. State, 116 Fla. 3, 156 So. 282; Eckles v. State, 132 Fla. 526, 180 So. 764; Sinclair v. State, 133 Fla. 77, 182 So. 637; Artigas v. State, 140 Fla. 671, 192 So. 795; Wenrich v. State, 159 Fla. 492, 3......