Edens v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R.R. Co.

Decision Date31 October 1880
CitationEdens v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R.R. Co., 72 Mo. 212 (Mo. 1880)
PartiesEDENS v. THE HANNIBAL & ST. JOSEPH RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court--HON. S. H. WOODSON. Judge.

REVERSED.

After the jury had been out several hours, they came into court and announced that they were unable to agree The judge then spoke to them of the time that had been consumed in the trial of the case, and discharged them until next morning, telling them: “Gentlemen, come back to-morrow morning with a determination to compromise.” When they came into the box next morning, the court again spoke to them of the great importance to the parties and to the county, that they agree upon a verdict, telling them orally, “that many things juries were authorized to compromise, such as amounts, that very seldom twelve men went into the jury room with the same notions as to amounts, and compromises were necessary,” and directed them to retire and make a verdict. To this action of the court the defendant excepted.

George W. Easley for appellant.

Belch & Silver for respondent.

HOUGH, J.

The material portion of the petition in this case, is as follows: “That on or about the 9th day of February, 1873, in the City of Kansas, Jackson county, Missouri, the defendant, not regarding its duty, and by reason of its negligence and carelessness, plaintiff was run against by one of defendant's cars, thereby throwing plaintiff upon the rail of the defendant, the said car of defendant then and there ran upon and over plaintiff. That plaintiff was then and there, by reason of the carelessness and negligence of defendant as aforesaid, broken and mutilated as to his right leg, to such an extent as to require its immediate amputation in order to save the life of the plaintiff, thereby permanently disabling him, in all which he has sustained great loss and damage, as well in the permanent mutilation of his body as aforesaid,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
96 cases
  • Hartgrove v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 14, 1949
    ... ... 388, 7 S.W ... 467; Chinn v. Davis, 21 Mo.App. 363; Edens v ... Hannibal & St. J.R.R. Co., 72 Mo. 212; McPeak v. Mo ... Pac ... ...
  • State v. Burton
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 9, 1946
    ... ... State v. Hill, 4 S.W. 121; State v ... Campbell, 149 S.W. 1173; Edens v. Hannibal & St ... J.R. Co., 72 Mo. 212; McPeak v. Mo. Pac. Ry ... ...
  • Hilz v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 19, 1890
    ...v. Railroad, 91 Mo. 37; Ischer v. Bridge Co., 95 Mo. 261; Harty v. Railroad, 95 Mo. 368; Dahlstrom v. Railroad, 8 S.W. 777; Edens v. Railroad, 72 Mo. 212; Waldheir Railroad, 71 Mo. 514; Buffington v. Railroad, 64 Mo. 246; Rine v. Railroad, 88 Mo. 400; Kendrick v. Railroad, 81 Mo. 520; Wood ......
  • Fairgrieve v. City of Moberly
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • February 6, 1888
    ...The costs are very heavy and another trial would incur very large costs, and for that reason you should agree on a verdict." Edens v. Railroad, 72 Mo. 212; State v. Alexander, 66 Mo. 163-4; Chinn Davis, 21 Mo.App. 363, and cases cited therein. VII. The verdict should be set aside on account......
  • Get Started for Free