Edgar v. Keller
Decision Date | 03 January 1895 |
Citation | 43 Neb. 263,61 N.W. 587 |
Parties | EDGAR v. KELLER ET AL. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
An order of a district court, which in effect determines that an appeal from an inferior court had been perfected in due time allowed by law for such purpose, and places the case upon its docket for adjudication, held not a final order, and not subject to review upon error to this court.
Appeal from district court, Cherry county; Crites, Judge.
Action by Hiram R. Edgar against George W. Keller and another for damages for trespass. Judgment in favor of plaintiff was rendered by the county court, and defendants appealed to the district court. Plaintiff moved for judgment in the district court, for defendants' failure to perfect their appeal. The motion was denied, and plaintiff appeals. Appeal dismissed.J. Wesley Tucker, for appellant.
Ed. Clarke, for appellees.
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants in the county court of Cherry county, and on the 10th day of November, A. D. 1890, and as a result of a trial therein, recovered a judgment for $25 and costs. It appears that, during the progress of appeal proceedings by the defendants, the county judge took (in accordance with a promise made to the attorney for defendants) the transcript, together with other and the original papers in the case, into the clerk's office, and left them there for filing; that for some reason the filing mark was not placed upon the transcript, or any of the papers. After the expiration of 30 days from the time the judgment was rendered in the county court, the plaintiff filed the following motion: On the 22d day of May, 1891, during a term of the district court then being held in Cherry county, affidavits were filed and oral testimony taken, the purpose of the evidence adduced being to show the leaving or filing of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McInerney & Conway Finance Corporation v. Smith
... ... appeal may be taken. Thatcher v. Watson, 51 Ohio St ... 561; Mining Co. v. Zappio, 80 Ohio St. 458, 468, [39 ... Wyo. 194] 89 N.E. 97; Edgar v. Keller, 43 Neb. 263, ... 61 N.W. 587; Edenfield vs. Barnhart, 5 Kan. 225; ... Dolbee v. Hoover, 8 Kan. 124; Weigand v ... Wilson, 107 Kan ... ...
-
Lewis v. Barker
... ... (See Smith ... v. Johnson, 37 Neb. 675, ... [65 N.W. 779] ... 56 N.W. 323; Seven Valleys Bank v. Smith, 43 Neb ... 237, 61 N.W. 606; Edgar v. Keller, 43 Neb. 263, 61 ... N.W. 587, and authorities therein cited.) Since the record ... fails to show that a final judgment of dismissal has ... ...
-
Ribble v. Furmin
...determination. Smith v. Sahler, 1 Neb. 310; Hall v. Vanier, 7 Neb. 397; Grimes v. Chamberlain, 27 Neb. 605, 43 N.W. 395; Edgar v. Keller, 43 Neb. 263, 61 N.W. 587; Parmele v. Schroeder, 59 Neb. 553, 81 N.W. 506. In Smith v. Sahler it was said that the judgment must "dispose of the merits of......
- Fawcett v. Powell