Edgewater Hosp. v. Bowen
Decision Date | 10 November 1986 |
Docket Number | No. 85 C 5866.,85 C 5866. |
Citation | 664 F. Supp. 1128 |
Parties | EDGEWATER HOSPITAL, Plaintiff, v. Otis BOWEN, Secretary, Health and Human Services, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois |
Howard M. Hoffman, Norman B. Berger, Christopher B. Cohen, Holleb & Coff, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.
James J. Kubik, Asst. U.S. Atty., for defendant.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate James T. Balog regarding this matter. For the reasons stated herein, the Court hereby adopts Magistrate Balog's Report and Recommendation.
Having reviewed the relevant caselaw and record of this case, the court concludes that the Secretary should not be entitled to benefit from the fact that the second NPR misled the plaintiff. The second NPR, like the first NPR, was entitled, "Notice of Program Reimbursement" and also provided that it was the "Revised and Final Settlement of Reopened Cost Report." Further, the second NPR provided that the plaintiff could write to the Board within 180 days of the second NPR for a hearing. Since plaintiff filed its appeal in accordance with this directive, the Secretary is estopped from claiming that plaintiff was required to appeal within 180 days of the first NPR. The Court agrees with plaintiff that the Secretary had an affirmative obligation to inform the plaintiff of its right to appeal the order and the relevant time period within which to do so. The plaintiff was entitled to rely on the second NPR and, therefore, timely filed an appeal of the second NPR.
Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Balog's Report and Recommendation and also finds that the Secretary is estopped from challenging the timeliness of plaintiff's appeal due to the fact that the second NPR issued by the Secretary indicated that plaintiff could appeal that NPR within 180 days. Since the court orders the PRRB to hold a hearing on claims 5 & 13, no findings will be made on plaintiff's constitutional claims.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
July 16, 1986.
JAMES T. BALOG, United States Magistrate.
Before the court are the parties cross-motions for summary judgment. The motions concern plaintiff Edgewater Hospital's claim for Medicare reimbursement.
Hospitals are entitled to reimbursement from the government for the actual, reasonable costs of furnishing care to Medicare beneficiaries. 42 U.S.C. § 1395cc(a)(1) (1982); 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(v)(1)(A) (1982). In seeking reimbursement, a hospital ("provider") may receive payments from a private agency. Id. § 1395h. If, as in the case at bar, the provider selects a private agency, that agency acts as the fiscal intermediary for the Secretary of Health and Human Services ("Secretary"), Id., and is initially responsible for awarding reimbursement. 42 C.F.R. § 405.406 (1983). The fiscal intermediary in the instant case is Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Illinois ("BCBS"). The final determination of reimbursable costs is made on the basis of the costs claimed by providers in the year-end cost report.
The rest of the fiscal intermediary's review process is succinctly stated in St. Joseph's Hospital v. Heckler, 786 F.2d 848 (8th Cir.1986) as follows:
The subject of controversy in the case at bar is whether the plaintiff filed the appeal within 180 days notice of the intermediary's final determination. The Secretary contends that if Edgewater did not file an appeal to the Board within 180 days, then the Board's refusal to hear the appeal would not be a "final decision" which the statute requires in order for the Board to have jurisdiction to hear the claim. 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f).
In determining whether Edgewater filed its appeal to the Board within 180 days, the parties admit the following facts:
Edgewater applied to BCBS for cost reimbursement from the Secretary for the hospital's fiscal year ending March 31, 1983. On February 15, 1984, the fiscal intermediary issued a Notice of Program Reimbursement ("NPR") specifically disallowing four items: Edgewater's claim for $461,460, representing costs associated for bringing the hospital in compliance with safety codes (Item 5); Edgewater's claim for $36,474 representing various laboratory expenses (Item 9); Edgewater's claim for $81,969 for funding of an educational program at one of Edgewater's satellite facilities (Item 13); and other miscellaneous lab expenses (Item 39).
On February 23, 1984, Edgewater requested that the intermediary reconsider the adjustments in the NPR to Items 5, 9, 13 and 39.
By letter dated March 22, 1984, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Edgewater Hosp., Inc. v. Bowen
...of the first Notice, the Board lacked jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1395oo(a). 3. Court Disposition: Edgewater Hospital v. Bowen, 664 F.Supp. 1128 (N.D.Ill.1986). On June 25, 1985, Edgewater filed a complaint against the Secretary of Health and Human Services in district court, se......
-
Rowan County Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co.
... ... Patrick, Chapel Hill, for Forsyth Memorial Hosp"., Inc. and Carolina Medicorp, Inc., amici curiae ... WHICHARD, Justice ... \xC2" ... ...