Edie v. Coleman
Decision Date | 20 May 1940 |
Docket Number | No. 19705.,19705. |
Citation | 141 S.W.2d 238 |
Parties | EDIE v. COLEMAN et al. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Brown Harris, Judge.
Action by S. C. Edie against M. B. Coleman and others in ejectment. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Miller, Gumbiner, Sheffrey & Van Valkenburgh, of Kansas City, for appellant.
Wm. Bush, of Kansas City, for respondents.
This is an action in ejectment. The case was tried before the court, without the aid of a jury, resulting in a judgment against the plaintiff and he has appealed. The appeal was taken to the Supreme Court but that court found that jurisdiction of the appeal rested in this court and transferred the case here.
The suit was brought against M. B. Coleman, Nellie E. Coleman, and their tenants, C. B. McKeever and Curtis L. Carter. However, the last two persons did not appear in the action. The judgment was in favor of M. B. and Nellie E. Coleman, who are hereinafter called defendants.
Plaintiff claimed title to the property in controversy by reason of being the record owner thereof. Defendants claim the property by adverse possession.
The facts show that defendants own property situated at the northeast corner of 37th and Olive Streets, in Kansas City, described as the south 35 feet of Lot 37 Sunset View. Plaintiff is the record owner of the property adjoining to the north, which property is described as the north 12½ feet of Lot 37 and the south 22 feet of Lot 38 Sunset View. In the year of 1907 and ever since there was a dwelling house on the lot now owned by defendants, and then owned by one Baltis, known as 3647 Olive Street, which dwelling house was wholly upon defendants' lot and did not, at that time, extend over on to the property now owned by plaintiff. In that year the property was sold and conveyed by Baltis to one Jack O. Cooper. In the year of 1909 Cooper had Baltis build a second dwelling house facing south on the lot now owned by defendants, which house was known and described as 2410 East 37th Street. This house has at all times extended over and upon the premises and lot now owned by the plaintiff at a point beginning 102.9 feet east of the west line of plaintiff's lot and continuing east 16.9 feet, said dwelling house extending over and upon plaintiff's lot 1.54 feet at the west end of the encroachment and 1.48 feet at the east end thereof. This dwelling house was, and is, adjoined by a concrete sidewalk 22 inches in width, which is upon the lot of plaintiff so that the north edge of said concrete sidewalk is 3 feet 4 inches north of the south line of plaintiff's lot.
Subsequent to the year of 1909, and on a date unknown, Cooper had Baltis build an addition to the dwelling house known as 3647 Olive Street, consisting of two bedrooms, a bath, a concrete drain and a basement under said rooms. Said addition, at the time it was built, and ever since, has extended over and upon the lot and premises now owned by plaintiff, commencing at a point 66.6 feet east of the west line of plaintiff's lot and continuing 17.6 feet east thereof, extending over and upon plaintiff's lot, as aforesaid .34 feet at the west end of said addition and .16 feet at the east end thereof and, in addition thereto, and adjoining said addition, as aforesaid, on the north and on the east thereof, and on plaintiff's lot, there was constructed a concrete walk 20 inches in width and at one point 3 feet 6 inches in width. All of the encroachments on plaintiff's ground were shown by a plat or survey introduced in evidence, and stipulated by the parties as being correct.
Cooper mortgaged his property to the Commerce Trust Company and defendants purchased the note secured by the deed of trust in April 1930 and acquired title to the property by foreclosure of the deed of trust on March 23, 1933. Plaintiff acquired his property from one Herman A. Berger on June 24, 1924. At this time, all of the improvements aforesaid had been erected for some time. About the time defendants acquired title to their property, plaintiff decided to build a concrete driveway along the south side of his property and caused the survey above mentioned to be made on March 29, 1933, which disclosed the encroachments on plaintiff's lot as above set forth. Shortly thereafter plaintiff made demand for the possession of the property encroached upon and defendants refused to remove the dwelling house, encroachments or extensions, resulting in this suit being brought on February 23, 1935.
The evidence further shows that neither plaintiff, nor defendants nor their predecessors in title, knew of the encroachments in question until March 29, 1933.
Jack O. Cooper, a witness for plaintiff, testified that he He further testified:
He further testified:
He further testified that
Defendant M. B. Coleman testified that he went out to inspect the property before purchasing the note and deed of trust; that the property was then in the same condition as it was at the time of the trial; that he did not know that the improvements encroached upon plaintiff's lot; that in order to remove the encroachments it would be necessary to ; that the cost of the work ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Wyoming State Bd. of Equalization
...23 P. 743 (1890). This court in Spriggs v. Cheyenne Newspapers, 63 Wyo. 416, 449, 182 P.2d 801, 814 (1947) (quoting Edie v. Coleman, 235 Mo.App. 1289, 141 S.W.2d 238 (1940)) " 'The intent of a person cannot be proven by direct and positive evidence. It is a question of fact, to be proven, l......
-
White v. St. Louis Post Offices Corp.
...for his own purposes, regardless of whether or not he knows in whom legal title to such land may be vested, holds it adversely. Edie v. Coleman, 141 S.W.2d 238; Brown Wilson, 131 S.W.2d 848; 80 A. L. R. 156-159; 1 R. C. L. 731. (b) There need not be, in order to establish title by adverse p......
-
Spriggs v. Cheyenne Newspapers, Inc., 2349
... ... The one is the ... exertion of the power of the mind; the other, the exertion of ... the power of the body." [63 Wyo. 449] So in Edie vs ... Coleman 235 Mo.App. 1289, 141 S.W.2d 238, the court ... declared that: "'The intent of a person cannot be ... proven by direct and ... ...
- Steiger v. City of Ste. Genevieve