Edwards v. Court of Common Pleas of Scioto County
| Decision Date | 23 October 1963 |
| Docket Number | No. 38065,38065 |
| Citation | 193 N.E.2d 393,175 Ohio St. 251 |
| Parties | , 24 O.O.2d 414 . Supreme Court of Ohio |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Richard L. Eisnaugle, J. Alden Staker, Ernest G. Littleton and Miller, Searl & Fitch, Portsmouth, for relators.
Lowell C. Thompson, Portsmouth, for respondents.
Relators are afforded an adequate remedy by way of appeal. This court will ordinarily, in the exercise of its discretion, deny a writ of prohibition where relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Masterson, v. Ohio State Racing Comm., 164 Ohio St. 312, 316, 130 N.E.2d 829. See State, ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St. 302, 123 N.E.2d 23.
The demurrer to the petition is sustained and a writ of prohibition denied.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Williams v. City of Canton
...273; State, ex rel. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc., v. Studebaker (1963), 175 Ohio St. 222, 193 N.E.2d 84; Edwards v. Court of Common Pleas (1963), 175 Ohio St. 251, 252, 193 N.E.2d 393; State, ex rel. Vitoratos, v. Whiddon (1965), 3 Ohio St.2d 52, 209 N.E.2d 171; State, ex rel. Smith, v. Hoffman ......
-
Harris v. Sweeney, 2004 Ohio 221 (Ohio App. 1/14/2004)
...has an adequate remedy at law, to wit, a direct appeal to this court from any subsequent conviction. In Edwards v. Court of Common Pleas of Scioto Co. (1963), 175 Ohio St. 251, 252, the Ohio Supreme Court held that relators were not entitled to relief pursuant to a writ of prohibition on th......