Edwards v. Edwards, 2D00-771.

Decision Date08 May 2002
Docket NumberNo. 2D00-771.,2D00-771.
Citation819 So.2d 837
PartiesKurt E. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. Carol Simone EDWARDS, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Mark A. Neumaier, Tampa, for Appellant.

Wanda J. Davis, Tampa, for Appellee.

WHATLEY, Judge.

The husband, Kurt E. Edwards, appeals the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm in all respects except as to the court's imposition of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) in connection with the husband's municipal pension as a firefighter. The trial court correctly recognized, pursuant to section 61.075(5)(a)(4), Florida Statutes (1999), that the husband's pension was a marital asset and that the wife, Carol Simone Edwards, had an interest therein. The problem is that the final judgment imposed a QDRO to secure the wife's interest. QDROs cannot be used to force direct payment to a nonparticipating spouse of a portion of a spouse's municipal pension benefits in order to achieve equitable distribution of marital assets. See Bd. of Pension Trs. v. Vizcaino, 635 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Accordingly, we remand this cause for the trial court to fashion an alternative method of distribution regarding the subject pension. Communication by counsel with the appropriate municipal entity will be indispensable in achieving a correct and sustainable result.

Affirmed in part; remanded in part.

COVINGTON, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., Senior Judge, concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Levy v. Levy, No. 2D03-2903
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 29 Abril 2005
  • Board of Trustees of Orlando Police Pension Plan v. Langford
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 20 Diciembre 2002
    ...in order to effect equitable distribution). Vizcaino has been followed by the Second District Court of Appeal. See Edwards v. Edwards, 819 So.2d 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (a QDRO could not be used to force direct payment to a nonparticipating spouse of a portion of a spouse's municipal pension......
  • Rumler v. Rumler, 2D05-2261.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 28 Junio 2006
    ...a municipal pension is not subject to equitable distribution by a qualified domestic relations order. § 185.25; Edwards v. Edwards, 819 So.2d 837, 838 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Carollo v. Carollo, 920 So.2d 16, 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Equity empowers the trial court to fashion an alternative remed......
  • Cozier v. Cozier, 2D00-2503.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 8 Mayo 2002
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Equitable distribution and property issues
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Family Law and Practice - Volume 1
    • 30 Abril 2022
    ...of a portion of the other spouse’s municipal pension benefits, in an equitable distribution of marital assets. [ Edwards v. Edwards, 819 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (court erred in imposing QDRO in connection with husband’s municipal pension as fire-fighter as part of equitable distributi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT