Edwards v. Kearney
| Decision Date | 01 January 1883 |
| Citation | 15 N.W. 329,14 Neb. 83 |
| Parties | E. O. EDWARDS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. FRANK E. KEARNEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR |
| Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
ERROR to the district court for Buffalo county. Tried below before GASLIN, J.
AFFIRMED.
Hamer & Conner, for plaintiff in error.
Sam. L. Savidge and E. C. Calkins, for defendant in error.
The bill of exceptions in this case having been stricken from the files of this court, in accordance with the opinion reported in 13 Neb. 502, the record is simply here for our examination without such bill.
Where it is sought to present to this court alleged errors occurring at a trial in the district court, a bill of exceptions, settled and signed as required by law, is indispensably necessary. And while in a proper case, upon timely application, this court would by mandamus compel the signing of such a bill by a trial judge, yet no other paper, record, or showing can be made to take its place. There being no error assigned, other than those depending upon the bill of exceptions, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Denise v. City of Omaha
...law is indispensably necessary.” Scott v. Spencer, 42 Neb. 632, 60 N. W. 892;Reynolds v. Dietz, 39 Neb. 180, 58 N. W. 89;Edwards v. Kearney, 14 Neb. 83, 15 N. W. 329. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. ...
-
Reynolds v. Dietz
...Y.], 35.) Talbot & Bryan, for other appellees, cited, as to the appeal and the motion to quash: Allen v. Miller, 11 Ohio St. 378; Edwards v. Kearney, 14 Neb. 83; Birdsell Carter, 16 Id., 423; Morrissey v. Kinsey, Id., 17; Webster v. Wray, 19 Id., 560; Morgan v. Bergen, 3 Id., 209; Baker v. ......
-
Shaw v. Diers Brothers & Company
...or properly certified transcripts thereof, are filed in this court, duly authenticated, they impart absolute verity. Edwards v. Kearney, 14 Neb. 83, 15 N.W. 329; Hoagland v. Van Etten, 23 Neb. 462, 36 N.W. In re Estate of Getchell, 98 Neb. 788, 154 N.W. 537. It follows that the affidavits f......
-
Scott v. Spencer
...at the trial in a district court, a bill of exceptions settled and signed as required by law is indispensably necessary. Edwards v. Kearney, 15 N. W. 329, 14 Neb. 83;Reynolds v. Dietz (Neb.) 58 N. W. 89, reaffirmed. Appeal from district court, Buffalo county; Holcomb, Judge. Bill by W. T. S......