Edwards v. Lodge
Citation | 113 S.W.2d 94,195 Ark. 470 |
Decision Date | 24 January 1938 |
Docket Number | 4-4898 |
Parties | EDWARDS v. LODGE |
Court | Supreme Court of Arkansas |
Appeal from Sevier Chancery Court; A. P. Steel, Chancellor affirmed.
Affirmed.
B E. Isbell and Abe Collins, for appellant.
Marion C. Early and Rose, Hemingway, Cantrell & Loughborough, for appellees.
Ivon Lodge, trustee, and the United Bank & Trust Company, filed a complaint in the Sevier chancery court against Patterson Orchards, Inc., William H. Armstrong, as trustee, Fruit Supply Company and Harry S. Kramer, Jr.
It was alleged that the Patterson Orchards, Inc., was the owner of certain described lands and that on November 1, 1930, it executed four promissory notes for the sum of $ 5,000 each. The notes were made payable to Harry S. Kramer, Jr.; that nothing had been paid on said notes for more than six years. To secure the payment of said notes the said Patterson Orchards, Inc., on the same date, executed and delivered to Ivon Lodge, as trustee for Harry S. Kramer, Jr., and his assigns or holders of the said notes, a deed of trust by which it conveyed to the said Lodge, as such trustee, certain described lands in Sevier county, Arkansas; that the said notes and deed of trust are now held by the United Bank & Trust Company of St. Louis, which acquired the same for a valuable consideration before maturity. On April 20, 1935, the time for payment of the notes was extended to July 1, 1937. It was further alleged that the Patterson Orchards, Inc., had permitted said lands to be sold to the state of Arkansas on November 19, 1935, and because of this breach of the covenants the appellee elected to declare said notes immediately due and payable. The said Patterson Orchards, Inc., on November 1, 1930, executed a deed of trust to William H. Armstrong as trustee for Harry S. Kramer, Jr., to secure an indebtedness of $ 50,192.86. Shortly after making this deed of trust, the said Patterson Orchards, Inc., was put into bankruptcy and a sale was had, and from the proceeds of the sale $ 16,692.86 was applied towards the satisfaction of the deed of trust to Armstrong. On December 1, 1931, the Patterson Orchards, Inc., executed to the Fruit Supply Company a mortgage to secure an indebtedness of $ 10,000; that this deed of trust and the mortgage to the Fruit Supply Company were subordinate to the lien of the deed of trust sought to be foreclosed by the appellee. It was alleged that the property described in the complaint consisted of 771.23 acres. Appellee prayed for the appointment of a receiver and that the lien of appellee be foreclosed and the proceeds of sale applied first to the cost of the suit and second to the satisfaction of the debt due the said United Bank & Trust Company.
B. E. Isbell was appointed attorney ad litem for the nonresident defendants. E. K. Edwards filed an intervention and cross-complaint, alleging that he was the owner and entitled to the possession of certain lands mentioned in appellee's complaint; that he purchased said lands from the state of Arkansas, and the land commissioner made a deed to him. He asked that the deed of trust sued on by appellee be canceled, and that his title be quieted and confirmed.
Abe Collins was appointed attorney ad litem to represent the nonresidents in the intervention.
Appellees filed answer to intervention and cross- complaint alleging that the title in Edwards was void. A reply was filed by the intervener, and to the second paragraph of the reply, appellee filed a demurrer. Edwards acknowledged that the appellee had tendered him $ 211.82, which he had paid to the state of Arkansas.
The chancery court entered a decree holding that the tax title of the appellant was void because the notice of the sale of lands for the taxes of the year 1933 was not given as required by law, but the court held that the appellant was entitled to be paid for tax liens discharged by him in the sum of $ 231.60 and for betterments to the land made by appellant in the sum of $ 176.20. The court also ordered that the deed be canceled and set aside as a cloud upon appellee's title to said land. The court also held that the deed from the state of Arkansas for the second described land should be, and is, canceled and that E. K. Edwards should recover the value of permanent improvements made on the lands and for the tax liens against said lands in the total sum of $ 407.80, and that said sum constituted a lien which was prior and paramount to any right, title, interest or lien of appellee and the defendants.
The following agreed statement of facts was introduced:
Under this notice appears the following:
There was then introduced in evidence a deed from the state of Arkansas to E. K. Edwards, said deed dated January 18, 1937 also deed from the state of Arkansas to E. K. Edwards dated February 25, 1937; also the certificate from the county clerk as to the amount of taxes for which the lands were forfeited, and for taxes that would have accrued against said lands in the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Berry v. Davidson
... ... ineffectual, had it been deemed otherwise applicable. Other ... recent cases supporting appellant's contention are ... Edwards v. Lodge, 195 Ark. 470, 113 S.W.2d ... 94; Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Horne, 195 ... Ark. 481, [199 Ark. 280] 113 S.W.2d 1091; McWilliams ... v ... ...
-
Berry v. Davidson, 4-5668.
...p. 402, ineffectual had it been deemed otherwise applicable. Other recent cases supporting appellant's contention are Edwards v. Lodge, 195 Ark. 470, 113 S.W.2d 94; Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Horne, 195 Ark. 481, 113 S.W.2d 1091; McWilliams v. Clampitt, 195 Ark. 908, 115 S.W.2d 280, as well ......
-
Trustees of First Baptist Church v. Ward, 85-37
...strict compliance with the notice of the tax sales themselves before an owner can be deprived of his property, Edwards v. Lodge, 195 Ark. 470, 113 S.W.2d 94 (1938); Brown v. Wall, 206 Ark. 576, 176 S.W.2d 707 (1949) and we have given a liberal construction to redemption laws favoring the re......
-
Emerson v. Voight
... ... which date was June 13, 1932 ... In each ... of the recent cases of Edwards v. Lodge, ... 195 Ark. 470, 113 S.W.2d 94; Union Bank & Trust Co ... v. Horne, 195 Ark. 481, 113 S.W.2d 1091, and ... McWilliams v. Clampitt, 195 ... ...