Edwards v. New York State Employees' Retirement System

Decision Date04 February 1993
Citation593 N.Y.S.2d 1011,190 A.D.2d 545
PartiesLeroy EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al., Respondents-Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J.), entered October 4, 1991, which dismissed the within petition brought pursuant to Article 78 to annul respondents' determination denying petitioner certain service credit in respondents' retirement system, on the grounds that the proceeding was time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs. On August 3, 1990, the NYCERS Board determined that petitioner's request for service credit was without legal basis. That determination was final and binding upon petitioner and commenced the running of the four month period of limitations (see, Matter of Edmead v. McGuire, 67 N.Y.2d 714, 499 N.Y.S.2d 934, 490 N.E.2d 853). While petitioner continued corresponding with various agencies and individuals after he received the August 3, 1990 determination of the NYCERS Board, that did not extend or toll his time to initiate an Article 78 proceeding (see, Matter of Cauldwest Realty v. City of New York, 160 A.D.2d 489, 554 N.Y.S.2d 153; Matter of Lubin, 60 N.Y.2d 974, 471 N.Y.S.2d 256, 459 N.E.2d 481). Since he failed to commence the Article 78 proceeding within four months after being notified of the August 3, 1990 determination, which was "final and binding" upon him, the proceeding was properly dismissed (CPLR 217)..

MILONAS, J.P., and ROSS, ASCH and RUBIN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Carter v. N.Y. City Employees' Ret. Sys.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 15 Diciembre 2010
    ...City of New York, 60 N.Y.2d 974, 976, 471 N.Y.S.2d 256, 459 N.E.2d 481 [1983] ). ( See Edwards v. New York State Employees' Retirement System, 190 A.D.2d 545, 545, 593 N.Y.S.2d 1011 [1st Dept.1993], citing Matter of Cauldwest Realty v. City of New York, 160 A.D.2d 489, 554 N.Y.S.2d 153 [1st......
  • Lewis v. Dagostino
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 2 Septiembre 2020
    ...Cerasaro, Inc. v. Ross, 60 N.Y.2d 946 (1983); Washington v. Rudin, 256 A.D.2d 178 (1st Dept. 1998); Edwards v. New York State Employees' Retirement System, 190 A.D.2d 545 (1st Dept. 1993); Dionisio v. Board of Educ. ofMahopac Cent. School Dist., 128 A.D.2d 524 (2d Dept. 1987). That is, unle......
  • People v. Nathaniel
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 4 Febrero 1993
    ... ... 190 A.D.2d 545 ... The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, ... Mark NATHANIEL, ... ...
  • M & D Contractors v. New York City Dept. of Health
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 21 Noviembre 1996
    ...the assessments, did not extend or toll its time to initiate an article 78 proceeding (see, Edwards v. New York State Employees' Retirement Sys., 190 A.D.2d 545, 593 N.Y.S.2d 1011, citing Matter of Cauldwest Realty Corp. v. City of New York, supra). As the proceeding is time-barred, petitio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT