Edwards v. State
Decision Date | 23 February 1910 |
Citation | 125 S.W. 894 |
Parties | EDWARDS v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Ft. Bend County; Wells Thompson, Judge.
Hattie Edwards was convicted of assault with intent to murder, and appeals. Affirmed.
Russell & Pearson, for appellant. John A. Mobley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
By indictment filed in the district court of Ft. Bend county on November 5, 1909, appellant was charged with assault with intent to murder one Joe Smith. On November 15th thereafter she was found guilty as charged in the indictment, and her punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of three years.
The statement of facts is very short. Prosecuting witness testified that in June of last year, about 12 o'clock at night, while lying on the bed next to the window that opened on the gallery at the house of his sister, Charity Anderson, appellant appeared at the window, cursed him, and leaned in and cut him on the arm; that he rolled over to get out of the bed, and she climbed in and cut him on the shoulder; that he ran in the next room, and she tried to follow him, but his sister came in with a pistol, and kept her off of him. He testified further that the wounds were very severe, and the one on the arm, which is across the elbow, was not at the time of the trial fully healed. The testimony of the witness Smith is fully corroborated by that of O. K. Davis, as well as appellant's sister, Charity Anderson. J. H. Stanley, introduced by the state, testified that he went to see Smith at his sister's solicitation, and found him severely cut on the arm and back of the shoulder; that he was bleeding at a great rate, and he thought he would have bled to death, had he not received assistance; that he had enough acquaintance with human anatomy and with knife wounds to be able to say that Smith was quite seriously cut; that he called in a physician to wait on him. He also testified that a knife or any sharp instrument capable of making the wounds that Joe Smith had is a dangerous weapon, and used in that manner would likely produce death.
Appellant was the only witness introduced in her own behalf. Her testimony in its entirety is in these words: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Regittano v. State
...shall be charged in every case with regard to each affirmative independent offense. McCall v. State, 14 Tex. App. 353; Edwards v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 342, 125 S. W. 894. It is believed, however, that where, as in the instant case, the defensive theory is an affirmative one — that is, wher......
-
Walker v. State
...therefor, it was not essential that the doctrine of reasonable doubt be appended to each paragraph of the charge. Edwards v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 342, 125 S. W. 894, and other cases listed in Vernon's Texas Crim. Statutes, vol. 2, p. 684, note Upon a careful review of the record, we are co......
-
Cole v. State
... ... the other instructions given, in any way tended to deprive ... defendant of proof of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, or ... resulted to his prejudice to the extent of depriving him of a ... fair trial. See, also, Teague v. State, 100 S.W ... 401; Edwards v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 342, 125 S.W ... 894; James v. State, 74 Tex. Cr. R. 139, 167 S.W ... 727; Nance v. State, 126 Ga. 95, 54 S.E. 932; ... Watts v. State, 9 Ga.App. 500, 71 S.E. 766 ... Further ... it is contended that the trial court erred in giving ... instruction ... ...
-
Andrews v. State
...as to demand a reversal in every instance in which the rule is not observed. See McCall v. State, 14 Tex. App. 353; Edwards v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 342, 125 S. W. 894; Regittano v. State, The facts in the case, the conduct of the trial, and the charge of the court, as a whole, should be lo......