Edwards v. State
Decision Date | 26 June 1991 |
Citation | 408 S.E.2d 802,200 Ga.App. 580 |
Parties | EDWARDS v. The STATE. A91A0196. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Waycaster, Corn, Murray & Morris, Cynthia N. Johnson, for appellant.
Jack O. Partain III, Dist. Atty., Todd L. Ray, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Defendant was charged in a 76 count indictment with 48 counts of burglary, 24 counts of entering a motor vehicle without authority and with intent to commit a theft therein, two counts of theft by taking, one count of theft by conversion and one count of giving a false name. Defendant pleaded not guilty and moved to sever the offenses for separate trials. An order on the motion to sever was not entered, but a 25 count indictment was entered and it reflects several charges of the original indictment, i.e., entering 24 motor vehicles without authority and with intent to commit a theft therein (Counts 1 through 24) and theft by taking (Count 25). The charges of the 25 count indictment were tried before a jury and defendant was found guilty of entering a van belonging to Clifford Parker (Count 12), entering eight motor vehicles belonging to Edd Kirby Chevrolet Incorporated (Counts 13-19) and theft by taking property belonging to Edd Kirby Chevrolet Incorporated (Count 25). Defendant was found not guilty on the remaining counts of the 25 count indictment. This appeal followed the denial of defendant's motion for new trial. Held:
1. Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial after it was discovered that five jurors read a newspaper article which placed defendant's character in issue.
At the beginning of the second day of trial, the following transpired: "[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Your honor, I have a motion to make.... [W]hen I got home last night I received my copy of the Daily Citizen News, ... and I looked on the left part of the front page, and I noticed 'In the News--Superior Court Begins' And I'd like to read this into the record.
The State's Attorney responded,
The trial court admonished the office of the District Attorney of the Conasauga Judicial Circuit for commenting on pending criminal cases and summoned the jury, giving instructions and making inquiry as follows:
The State's alleged misconduct is not an issue, the controlling issue is whether a mistrial was essential to the preservation of defendant's right to a fair trial. Whiteley v. State, 188 Ga.App. 129(1), 131, 372 S.E.2d 296.
" ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Phillips v. State
...failed to preserve this alleged error. Watkins v. State, 206 Ga.App. 701, 705(4), 426 S.E.2d 238 (1992); Edwards v. State, 200 Ga.App. 580, 584(3), 408 S.E.2d 802 (1991). (b) As background to the introduction of Phillips' inculpatory statement, the State asked the interviewing officer what ......
-
Nelms v. State
...controlling issue is whether a mistrial was essential to the preservation of defendant's right to a fair trial." Edwards v. State, 200 Ga.App. 580, 582(1), 408 S.E.2d 802 (1991). Under the circumstances, we find no abuse of the court's discretion in denying a mistrial. See Smallwood v. Stat......
-
J.B., In Interest of, A96A1304
...the guilt of the accused independently of the testimony of the accomplice." (Punctuation and citations omitted.) Edwards v. State, 200 Ga.App. 580, 584(4), 408 S.E.2d 802 (1991).' Tucker v. State, 205 Ga.App. 683, 684, 423 S.E.2d 422. In the case sub judice, there was no evidence, however s......
-
Deal v. State, A98A0333.
...264 Ga. 335, 338(6), 443 S.E.2d 477 (1994); Dent v. State, 220 Ga.App. 147, 148(2), 469 S.E.2d 311 (1996); Edwards v. State, 200 Ga.App. 580, 581(1), 408 S.E.2d 802 (1991). Deal's failure to present evidence at the motion for new trial hearing that any juror was exposed to the coverage prec......