Edwards v. State, 21604

Citation125 S.E.2d 506,217 Ga. 804
Decision Date25 April 1962
Docket NumberNo. 21604,21604
PartiesHarrison EDWARDS v. The STATE.
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

Pritchard & Thomas, Waycross, for plaintiff in error.

Deway Hayes, Sol. Gen., Douglas, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

GRICE, Justice.

The defendant was convicted of burglary, and his amended motion for new trial was denied. He brought his writ of error to this court, predicating jurisdiction upon the fact that one of the grounds of his motion was that he was required to go to trial without sufficient time for appointed counsel to properly prepare his case, in violation of Article I, Section I, Paragraph V of the Constitution of Georgia (Code Ann. § 2-105). However, such assignment of error does not draw into question the construction of any provision of the Constitution of Georgia or the constitutionality of any law of this State, but only the application of an unambiguous provision of the Georgia Constitution to a given state of facts, and there being no other basis for this court's jurisdiction, the Court of Appeals, and not this court, has jurisdiction of this writ of error. National Linen Service Corp. v. Thompson, 216 Ga. 550, 118 S.E.2d 486, and cases cited.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Allen v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 18 Marzo 1964
    ...v. State of Georgia, 209 Ga. 282, 71 S.E.2d 548; Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. Grimes, 215 Ga. 324, 110 S.E.2d 343; and Edwards v. State, 217 Ga. 804, 125 S.E.2d 506 and the cases there cited. We have not overlooked or failed to consider the decision in Crumb v. State, 205 Ga. 547, 54 S.E.2d ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT