Efraimson v. State, 4-86-0356
| Decision Date | 27 August 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 4-86-0356,4-86-0356 |
| Citation | 493 So.2d 79,11 Fla. L. Weekly 1864 |
| Parties | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1864 Andrew George EFRAIMSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Andrew George Efraimson, pro se.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Penny H. Brill, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for post-conviction relief which claimed that insufficient reasons had been given by the sentencing judge for deviating from the sentencing guidelines. We affirm, not only because we find no error in the deviation, see State v. Baker, 483 So.2d 423 (Fla.1986) and Ballard v. State, 11 F.L.W. 1179, --- So.2d ---- (Fla. 4th DCA May 21, 1986), but because we believe appellant, who appealed his conviction and sentence but was unsuccessful, had no right to subsequently challenge alleged sentencing errors that could and should have been raised on appeal. Richardson v. State, 491 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Senior v. State, 86-1915
...under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 or 3.850 if the issue could have been raised on a direct appeal. See Efraimson v. State, 493 So.2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Richardson v. State, 491 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA), dismissed, 500 So.2d 545 (Fla.1986); Chippas v. State, 482 So.2d 528 ......