Eggers v. Stansbury
| Decision Date | 11 December 1918 |
| Docket Number | 516. |
| Citation | Eggers v. Stansbury, 177 N.C. 85, 97 S.E. 619 (N.C. 1918) |
| Parties | EGGERS v. STANSBURY. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Watauga County; Cline, Judge.
Action by J. C. Eggers against Ira Stansbury. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
This is an action to recover about five acres of land, the controversy evidently having arisen on account of the draftsman of the plaintiff's deed having copied one line in an old deed 50 poles instead of 55 poles.
The matters in issue were, by consent, sent to a referee for trial, and were heard in the superior court upon exceptions to the report, and the court, among other things, found the following facts:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
English Lumber Co. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.
... ... Eggers v. Stanbury, 177 N.C. 85, 97 S.E ... 619), and they make out a case of usury against the ... defendant ... It is ... found as ... ...