Ehlinger v. Clark
Citation | 284 S.W. 974 |
Decision Date | 15 April 1926 |
Docket Number | (No. 8750.) |
Parties | EHLINGER, County Judge, et al. v. CLARK. |
Court | Court of Appeals of Texas |
Suit by John P. Ehlinger, County Judge, and others against I. E. Clark. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error. Affirmed.
John P. Ehlinger, of La Grange, for plaintiffs in error.
H. R. Clark, of La Grange, and H. W. Wallace, of Cuero, for defendant in error.
This suit was brought by plaintiffs in error against the defendant in error to recover the amount due upon two notes for the sum of $2,000 each, executed by the defendant in favor of plaintiff Ehlinger, county judge of Fayette county.
The answer of defendant contains exceptions to plaintiffs' petition, on the ground that it shows upon its face the lease contract, in consideration of which the notes sued on were executed, was illegal and void, and therefore said notes were without consideration and their payment unenforceable. These exceptions are followed by the following special plea:
The trial in the court below without a jury resulted in a judgment in favor of defendant.
The oil lease contract, in consideration of which the notes sued on were executed, is evidenced by written instruments containing many stipulations and agreements which are not material to the question presented by this appeal and need not be set out in detail.
The instrument leases to appellee, for a consideration of $5 cash and the two notes for $2,000 described in plaintiffs' petition, 4,000 acres of school lands of Fayette county, situated in Baylor county, for the purpose of mining and operating for oil and gas. The lease is for a term of five years, and as long thereafter as active drilling operations are carried on by the lessee, or oil or gas is produced from the land by the lessee. The lessee agrees to deliver to the lessor one-eighth of all the oil produced from the land, and to pay an agreed price for the gas that he might produce therefrom not used in carrying on the drilling operations on the property.
Drilling operations were to begin in one year, but might be deferred from year to year during the five-year period of the lease by the payment by the lessee, in advance, of the sum of $200. The lessee is also given the right to transfer the lease or to sublease the land or any part thereof, and agrees to pay to the county a portion of the bonus or royalty he might receive from such assignment or sublease.
We think the trial court correctly held that the commissioners' court was not authorized to make the lease because it was in effect a conveyance of an interest in the school lands of Fayette county for a consideration which in part was not money, and because it gives the lessee the right to sell and dispose of the oil and gas in said lands upon such terms as he might deem proper, thus in substance and effect delegating to the lessee an authority and discretion in the disposition of the county school lands which the law vests in the commissioners' court, and which is nondelegable.
The contract of lease gives the appellee the right to take the oil from the school lands of Fayette county for a consideration of one-eighth of such oil to be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ehlinger v. Clark
...Judge, in behalf of Fayette County, and others, against I. E. Clark. Judgment for defendant was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (284 S. W. 974), and plaintiffs bring error. Judgments of district court and Court of Civil Appeals reversed and rendered, in so far as they denied recovery......