Ehrich v. Durkee
Decision Date | 08 June 1903 |
Citation | 72 P. 814,18 Colo.App. 502 |
Parties | EHRICH v. DURKEE. |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Appeal from El Paso County Court.
Action by Rose M. Durkee against Louis R. Ehrich. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Lunt Brooks & Willcox, for appellant.
Charles H. Dudley, for appellee.
January 10, 1893, Charles E. Durkee was a creditor of the Ute Pass Land & Water Company to the amount of $657.08. $487.80 of this amount was to be paid in land, and the balance in cash. Previous to above date, Durkee had commenced a suit in attachment against the company for the purpose of enforcing payment of his claim. Appellant was president of the Ute Pass Land & Water Company. As the result of an interview between Durkee and Ehrich, the following contract was entered into by them:
Under date of December 28, 1893, Durkee made the following demand in writing upon the appellant:
The complaint set forth the contract and demand, alleged performance on part of plaintiff, the failure of defendant to convey or cause to be conveyed the land, and prayed judgment for $487.80 and interest. The answer admitted the execution and delivery of the contract; denied selection of the land by a sufficient description; alleged that the contract was without consideration; that the land was the property of the Ute Pass Land & Water Company; that defendant was acting solely as...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
C-470 Joint Venture v. Trizec Colorado, Inc., C-470
...could be built was sufficiently certain, given external evidence of defendant's land and adjoining properties); Ehrich v. Durkee, 18 Colo.App. 502, 72 P. 814, 816 (Colo.1903) (finding valid contract when vendee was to pick land equal to $487.80 within one year from designated lots). See gen......