Eisenberg v. Gilbert

Decision Date01 April 1957
PartiesDavid EISENBERG, Appellant, v. David GILBERT, Harry Miller, Milbit Manufacturing Co. Inc., Irving Eisman, Leah Eisman and Alexander Gilbert, Respondents, and Harry Greenfield, Defendant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Milton Pinkus, Hempstead, for appellant.

Abraham L. Porchnick, New York City, Joseph Davidoff, Brooklyn, Alexander Berman, Hempstead, for respondents.

Action by a judgment creditor, a lessor, to set aside (1) a bulk sale by his debtors of their partnership assets, and (2) separate conveyances by them of their respective inchoate interests as tenants by the entirety in their individual homes, upon the grounds that (a) said sale did not comply with section 44 of the Personal Property Law, in that notice thereof was not given to appellant, the lessor, and (b) said sale and conveyances were in fraud of creditors. The appeal is from a judgment entered after trial, before an Official Referee, dismissing the complaint on the merits. The Official Referee found that appellant was not a creditor at the time of the transfers, there then being no arrears in the payment of rent under the lease. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT