Eisic Trading Corp. v. Somerset Marine, Inc.

Citation622 N.Y.S.2d 728,212 A.D.2d 451
PartiesEISIC TRADING CORP., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. SOMERSET MARINE, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and Daniel Ollech, Ofrer, Inc., et al., Defendants.
Decision Date21 February 1995
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

S.V. Col, for plaintiffs-respondents.

J.A. French, for defendant-appellant.

Before WALLACH, J.P., and RUBIN, ROSS, ASCH and MAZZARELLI, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered January 7, 1994, which, inter alia, directed defendant-appellant to comply with the Special Master's ruling to produce certain documents for disclosure, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to find the documents are immune from disclosure (Miracle Sound v. New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 169 A.D.2d 468, 469, 564 N.Y.S.2d 346) as attorney-client communications, attorney workproduct, or materials prepared in anticipation of litigation (CPLR 3101[b], [c], [d][2]. The attorney-client privilege applies only to confidential communications with counsel, not to information obtained from or communicated to third parties (Matter of Civil Serv. Employees Assn. v. Ontario County Health Facility, 103 A.D.2d 1000, 478 N.Y.S.2d 380, lv dismissed 64 N.Y.2d 816, 486 N.Y.S.2d 926, 476 N.E.2d 325) or to underlying factual information (Miranda v. Miranda, 184 A.D.2d 286, 584 N.Y.S.2d 818). Most of the documents at issue here were either disclosed to or authored by third parties, such as claims adjustors, or contained nonprivileged factual information, and cannot be considered attorney workproduct since they were not prepared by attorneys employed as such (Graf v. Aldrich, 94 A.D.2d 823, 824, 463 N.Y.S.2d 124). Nor are the fee statements privileged since they did not contain detailed accounts of the legal services rendered (cf., Licensing Corp. of Am. v. National Hockey League Players Assn., 153 Misc.2d 126, 580 N.Y.S.2d 128).

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • DiBella v. Hopkins
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • April 4, 2005
    ...privileged when they do not contain detailed accounts of the legal services rendered. See Eisic Trading Corp. v. Somerset Marine, Inc., 212 A.D.2d 451, 451-52, 622 N.Y.S.2d 728 (1st Dep't 1995). Time records and billing statements that are "detailed in showing services, conversations, and c......
  • Orange County Publications, Inc., a Div. of Ottaway Newspapers v. County of Orange
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • June 15, 1995
    ...statements which do not provide "detailed accounts" of the legal services provided by counsel (Eisic Trading Corp. v. Somerset Marine, Inc., 212 A.D.2d 451, 622 N.Y.S.2d 728, 729 [1st Dept.1995]; see, Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 [2d Cir.1962], cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951, 83 S.Ct. ......
  • McCrory v. Vill. of Mamaroneck
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • October 27, 2011
    ...to third parties [internal citations omitted] or to underlying factual information." Eisic Trading Corp. v. Somerset Marine, Inc., 212 A.D.2d 451, 622 N.Y.S.2d 728 (1st Dep't 1995). To qualify for the privilege such communications must have been made for the purpose of obtaining or facilita......
  • Nyu Hosps. Ctr. v. Concert Health Plan, Index No. 113904/2010
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • October 31, 2013
    ...Dep't 2012); Netherbv Ltd. v. G.V. Trademark Invs., Ltd., 261 A.D.2d 161 (1st Dep't 1999); Eisic Trading Corp. v. Somerset Marine, Inc., 212 A.D.2d 451 (1st Dep't 1995). The facts recounted by Feller do not become privileged work product merely because plaintiff's attorney compiled them. Br......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
  • Privileges
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2015 Contents
    • August 2, 2015
    ...Systems International Corp. v. Chemical Bank , 78 N.Y.2d 371, 575 N.Y.S.2d 809 (1991); Eisic Trading Corp. v. Somerset Marine, Inc ., 212 A.D.2d 451, 622 N.Y.S.2d 728 (1st Dept. 1995); Bekins Record Storage Co., Inc. v. Morgenthau , 62 N.Y.2d 324, 476 N.Y.S.2d 806 (1984). Examples of materi......
  • Privileges
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2019 Contents
    • August 2, 2019
    ...Systems International Corp. v. Chemical Bank , 78 N.Y.2d 371, 575 N.Y.S.2d 809 (1991); Eisic Trading Corp. v. Somerset Marine, Inc ., 212 A.D.2d 451, 622 N.Y.S.2d 728 (1st Dept. 1995); Bekins Record Storage Co., Inc. v. Morgenthau , 62 N.Y.2d 324, 476 N.Y.S.2d 806 (1984). Examples of materi......
  • Privileges
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2021 Contents
    • August 2, 2021
    ...Systems International Corp. v. Chemical Bank , 78 N.Y.2d 371, 575 N.Y.S.2d 809 (1991); Eisic Trading Corp. v. Somerset Marine, Inc ., 212 A.D.2d 451, 622 N.Y.S.2d 728 (1st Dept. 1995); Bekins Record Storage Co., Inc. v. Morgenthau , 62 N.Y.2d 324, 476 N.Y.S.2d 806 (1984). Examples of materi......
  • Privileges
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2014 Contents
    • August 2, 2014
    ...Systems International Corp. v. Chemical Bank , 78 N.Y.2d 371, 575 N.Y.S.2d 809 (1991); Eisic Trading Corp. v. Somerset Marine, Inc ., 212 A.D.2d 451, 622 N.Y.S.2d 728 (1st Dept. 1995); Bekins Record Storage Co., Inc. v. Morgenthau , 62 N.Y.2d 324, 476 N.Y.S.2d 806 (1984). Examples of materi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT