Ekman v. State
Decision Date | 30 May 1935 |
Citation | 161 So. 716,120 Fla. 24 |
Parties | EKMAN et al. v. STATE. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Error to Circuit Court, Broward County; George W. Tedder, Judge.
Carl Ekman and others were convicted of larceny of a cow, and they bring error.
Affirmed.
COUNSEL Roach & Hoyl, of Fort Lauderdale, for plaintiff in error.
Cary D Landis, Atty. Gen., and Roy Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of larceny of a cow.
Plaintiffs in error only question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.
The unlawful taking, killing, and converting of the property by the defendants is fully established; in fact, the defendants admitted taking and killing the cow without any pretense of right or ownership. Their theory of defense was that they were so drunk by the use of intoxicating liquor that they did not know or remember anything about the details or butchering and taking the cow away in a truck and were, by reason of such intoxicated condition, incapable of forming or entertaining the criminal intent to commit the act. Defendants evidently hoped to bring themselves apparently within the rule stated in the case of Garner v State, 28 Fla. 113, 9 So. 835, 29 Am. St. Rep. 232.
The record shows that the defendants left the head of the cow with a metal tag in one ear and an 'S' brand on the jaw in the marsh a short distance from where they butchered the cow, and that one of the defendants remembered enough about the matter to take officers to the scene and show them where the head had been thrown in the marsh. There the head was found.
The court, amongst other things, charged the jury as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Harris v. State
...requisite intent at the time of the killing. Garner was followed in Jenkins v. State, 58 Fla. 62, 50 So. 582 (1909), and Ekman v. State, 120 Fla. 24, 161 So. 716 (1935), where both cases held the defense of intoxication was a question for the jury. Although the Florida Supreme Court in Brit......