Elkins v. Cinera Realty, Inc.
| Decision Date | 27 February 1978 |
| Citation | 61 A.D.2d 828,402 N.Y.S.2d 432 |
| Parties | Cory ELKINS, Appellant, v. CINERA REALTY, INC., Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Brian A. Sheridan, New York City, for appellant.
Bloom, Epstein, Wayne, Reiss & Milner, New York City (Ronald B. Goodman and Robert M. Milner, New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before HOPKINS, J. P., and SHAPIRO, HAWKINS and O'CONNOR, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action inter alia pursuant to section 234 of the Real Property Law to recover attorney's fees incurred in the successful defense of summary proceedings, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Morton, J.), entered April 12, 1977, which, upon defendant's motion, dismissed so much of the complaint as sought a declaratory judgment and referred the request for attorney's fees to the Housing Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, for disposition.
Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Special Term properly dismissed so much of the complaint as sought a declaratory judgment on the ground that such relief is not warranted in this type of action. Plaintiff-appellant's claim for reasonable attorney's fees cannot be determined on this appeal. Although the statute provides that such an award may be made in appropriate circumstances if there is a " successful defense of any action or summary proceeding commenced by the landlord against the tenant arising out of the lease" (Real Property Law, § 234), it is clear that the Legislature intended such an award to be based on the ultimate outcome of the controversy, whether or not such outcome is on the merits. The first two summary proceedings commenced against plaintiff on behalf of defendant-respondent were dismissed without prejudice (the first due to the nonappearance of the landlord and the second because of the defective verification of the petition). A third summary proceeding has apparently been commenced. If the landlord is ultimately successful in recovering the rent due under the lease, it would be unjust to allow the plaintiff-tenant to recover his reasonable attorney's fees based on the outcome of each separate stage of what is clearly one controversy.
In that event, the court should consider the efforts expended by plaintiff in defending the first two summary proceedings. For the foregoing reasons, the order remanding the action to the Housing Part of the Civil Court is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Greco v. GSL Enterprises, Inc.
... ... Keith, 68 Misc.2d 110, 326 N.Y.S.2d 823; ... but see Cox v. First Natl. Realty & Constr. Corp., 50 A.D.2d 535, 375 N.Y.S.2d 135) ... Numerous cases have held ... (Elkins v. Cinera Realty, 61 A.D.2d 828, 402 N.Y.S.2d ... 432; N.V. Madison, Inc. v. Saurwein, supra.) ... ...
-
Scotia Associates v. Bond
...where the petition is dismissed on motion and the merits are not addressed." (p. 995, 487 N.Y.S.2d 252). Cinera Realty, Inc., 61 A.D.2d 828, 402 N.Y.S.2d 432 (2d Dept.1978), where two summary non-payment proceedings were dismissed on procedural grounds, but a third one was pending, the cour......
-
Barstow Road Owners, Inc. v. Billing
...court. Attorney's fees if appropriate are only available upon the ultimate outcome of the proceedings. Elkins v. Cinera Realty, 61 A.D.2d 828, 402 N.Y.S.2d 432 (2nd Dept., 1978). Respondents' third counterclaim (eleventh affirmative defense) alleges that the petitioner intentionally commenc......
-
Nesbitt v. New York City Conciliation and Appeals Bd.
...the totality of circumstances in assessing the reasonable value of the successful parties' counsel fees (see e.g. Elkins v. Cinera Realty, Inc., 61 A.D.2d 828, 402 N.Y.S.2d 432). Accordingly, the motion for an assessment is granted. In order to expedite the trial of the reasonable value of ......