Ellerbe, Superintendent of Insurance v. The United Masonic Benefit Association; Cannon, Intervenors
Citation | 21 S.W. 843,114 Mo. 501 |
Parties | Ellerbe, Superintendent of Insurance, v. The United Masonic Benefit Association; Cannon et al., Intervenors, Appellants |
Decision Date | 13 March 1893 |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. -- Hon. Daniel Dillon Judge.
Affirmed.
W. H Miller and Dickson & Smith for appellants.
(1) The circuit court erred in overruling the exceptions of intervenors to the report of the commissioner, and in refusing to decree the sum of $ 4,282.89 to be a trust fund in the hands of plaintiff for the payment of intervenors' claim, and in failing to give intervenors a lien thereon prior to the claims of other persons. 2 Story's Equity Jurisprudence [13 Ed.] sec. 1231, p. 577; Pinch v Anthony, 8 Allen, 536; 1 Jones on Liens, sec. 37, p. 26; Van Alen v. Bank, 52 N.Y. 1; People v. Bank, 96 N.Y. 32; St. Louis v. Johnson, 5 Dillon, 241; Schiernberg v. Stephens, 32 Mo.App. 314; Matter Equitable Ass'n, 61 Hun, 299. (2) Intervenors are entitled, under the contracts evidenced by the certificates in evidence, to the fund in question. Any statute which seeks to make disposition of said fund otherwise than as provided by said certificates, impairs the obligation of the contracts created by said certificates, and is void. Story on the Constitution [5 Ed.] sec. 1385; Edwards v. Kearzey, 96 U.S. 595; State v. Miller, 50 Mo. 129; Jackson Place Skating and Bathing Rink, 52 Mo. 552; Nilson v. County of Chariton, 60 Mo. 386.
Huff & Hereford for respondent.
Section 5934 controls the distribution of funds of this company, and intervenors are entitled only to pro rata payment. Ellerbe v. Mut. Aid Ass'n, 106 Mo. 13.
The appellants, intervenors herein, are the beneficiaries and their representatives of the three certificates of membership mentioned in the agreed statement of facts, on which the issue was tried below, and which is submitted here, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Daggs v. The Orient Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut
... ... construed. Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616; ... Ah Kow v. Neuman, 5 ... Ellerbe v ... Association, 114 Mo. 501; Havens v ... ...
-
Yeats v. Dodson
... ... Exchange, an Unincorporated Association, Appellants No. 35597 Supreme Court of Missouri ... (1) The ... insurance contract in question was an Oklahoma contract ... U.S. 617; Hardware Underwriters v. United States, 65 ... Ct. of Claims, 282, certiorari ... Mixer, 267 U.S. 544; Ellerbe ... v. United Masonic Ben. Assn., 114 Mo. 501, ... ...
-
Karnes v. American Fire Insurance Company of Philadelphia
... ... Ellerbe ... v. U. M. B. Ass'n, 114 Mo. 501. (3) This is ... Constitution of the United States, and fifth and fourteenth ... amendments ... ...
-
Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. Heitzman
... ... benefit and to convey to said beneficiary by contract a ... Charles v ... Hackman, 133 Mo. 634; Ellerbe v. Ben. Assn., ... 114 Mo. 501; State ex rel. v ... Plaintiff is a fraternal association incorporated under the ... laws of ... in order to create a new contract of insurance, but ... simply to follow the mode prescribed in ... the statutes supra. [Masonic Ben. Assn. v. Bunch, ... 109 Mo. 560, 19 S.W ... ...