Ellet v. McCord
Decision Date | 10 June 1931 |
Docket Number | No. 7550.,7550. |
Citation | 41 S.W.2d 110 |
Parties | ELLET et al. v. McCORD et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Coleman County; E. J. Miller, Judge.
Suit by J. P. McCord, executor, and others against Florence Overall Ellet and others. From the judgment, defendants appeal.
Reformed and affirmed.
Dibrell & Starnes, of Coleman, for appellant.
Chas. J. Schuck, of Wheeling, W. Va., and Critz & Woodward, of Coleman, for appellees Mary Medley McCully, Agillia M. Franzell, Charles P. Van Cleve, and Mary Van Cleve.
W. Marcus Weatherred, of Coleman, for appellee J. P. McCord.
Appellee J. P. McCord, executor of the will and estate of Mrs. Martha Tyler Overall, deceased, filed this suit against all persons interested in the will or estate of said decedent to construe her holographic will and her holographic codicil thereto, which read, omitting unnecessary portions, as follows:
The will and codicil were duly admitted to probate. J. P. McCord was appointed and qualified as executor. The money bequests aggregated $436,000, of which $100,000, the bequest to the Coleman Hospital, and the $1,500 bequest to Frank E. Williams were eliminated by the codicil. All other money bequests were paid except the $2,000 provided in clause 15 as a cemetery endowment fund. The trial court ordered the executor to pay this amount as directed. At the time testatrix executed the will, she had $4,083.97 in cash, bonds and securities valued at $70,000, and cattle valued at $35,000, and her real estate was of a value more than sufficient to pay all pecuniary bequests. At the time she executed the codicil, she had disposed of her bonds and securities to build and equip the Coleman Hospital, and she had on hand $3,734.61 in cash and cattle valued at $25,000 and the same real estate which she owned on the date she executed the will. At the time of her death, testatrix had $2,500 in cash, cattle valued at $40,000, and the same real estate which she owned at the time she executed both the will and the codicil, and which exceeded in value all...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Van Hoose v. Moore
...only. We do not think such a narrow construction of the word 'estate' reflects the intention of the settlor. The Court in Ellet v. McCord (Tex.Civ .App.) 41 S.W.2d 110 (Writ Ref.), held: 'The word 'estate' means property, and 'property' means estate, and, unless otherwise limited, the use o......
-
Shriner's Hospital for Crippled Children of Texas v. Stahl
... ... 1163 (1931). Where the will contains a residuary clause, the presumption against intestacy is especially strong. Ellet v ... McCord, 41 S.W.2d 110, 113 (Tex.Civ.App. Austin 1931, writ ref'd); Calloway v. Estate of Gasser, 558 S.W.2d 571, 574 (Tex.Civ.App. Tyler ... ...
-
Carr v. Rogers
...used in the will may carry the whole of her property. Briggs v. Peebles, 144 Tex. 47, 188 S.W.2d 147 (1945); Ellet v. McCord, 41 S.W.2d 110 (Tex.Civ.App.1931, writ refused); Casey v. Kelley, 185 S.W.2d 492 (Tex.Civ.App.1945, writ refused); Crites v. Faulkner, 245 S.W.2d 1013 (Tex.Civ.App.19......
-
Kuehn v. Bremer
...or partially intestate, the former will be adopted. Ferguson v. Ferguson, 121 Tex. 119, 45 S.W.2d 1096, 79 A.L.R. 1163; Ellet v. McCord, Tex.Civ. App., 41 S.W.2d 110, error The rule announced in Dulin v. Moore, 96 Tex. 135, 70 S.W. 742, is that a will should be so construed as to give effec......