Elliot v. Barrow, 87-819

CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)
Writing for the CourtTHOMPSON
Citation13 Fla. L. Weekly 1330,526 So.2d 989
Parties13 Fla. L. Weekly 1330 Patricia S. ELLIOT as Personal Representative of the Estate of Francis T. Elliot, Jr., deceased, for the benefit of Patricia S. Elliot and the Estate of Francis T. Elliot, Jr., Appellant, v. Mark V. BARROW, M.D., Robert Thoburn, M.D., et al., Appellees.
Docket NumberNo. 87-819,87-819
Decision Date03 June 1988

Page 989

526 So.2d 989
13 Fla. L. Weekly 1330
Patricia S. ELLIOT as Personal Representative of the Estate of Francis T. Elliot, Jr., deceased, for the benefit of Patricia S. Elliot and the Estate of Francis T. Elliot, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Mark V. BARROW, M.D., Robert Thoburn, M.D., et al., Appellees.
No. 87-819.
District Court of Appeal of Florida,
First District.
June 3, 1988.
Rehearing Denied July 7, 1988.

Alan S. Wilhite, Gainesville and Richard G. Collins, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.

Page 990

Richard T. Jones of Jones & Carter, P.A., Gainesville, for appellees.

THOMPSON, Judge.

Patricia Elliot, the widow of Francis T. Elliot, Jr. and the plaintiff below, appeals a final order dismissing with prejudice her medical malpractice action against appellee H.C.A. Health Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a North Florida Regional Hospital. We reverse.

On July 2, 1984 the decedent, Francis T. Elliot, Jr., fainted at home and was taken by ambulance to North Florida Regional Hospital. While he was left alone in the x-ray department on a table he fainted again, fell off the table, and was injured. He died approximately three months later on October 7, 1984, allegedly as a result of these injuries.

In compliance with § 768.57, Fla.Stat. (1986) appellant provided notice of her intent to initiate litigation to all prospective defendants on May 30, 1986. Appellant filed her initial wrongful death complaint on November 3, 1986. Named as defendants were the decedent's two treating physicians, their professional association, the appellee hospital and the Florida Patient's Compensation Fund. Appellant filed an amended complaint on April 13, 1987. The amended complaint's third count alleged that the hospital and its employees were negligent in leaving decedent unattended and unsecured, and that they willfully misled decedent and his family as to the nature of his condition so as to convince them no health care provider was responsible for his injuries and ultimate death. The hospital filed a motion to dismiss arguing that the 2 year statute of limitations of § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. barred plaintiff's claim. Specifically the hospital argued that decedent's fall on July 2, 1984, or, at the latest, his death on October 7, 1984 was the incident triggering the statute which would therefore have run July 2, 1986 or October 7, 1986, at the latest, thereby barring appellant's November 3, 1986 action. The hospital also argued that for a variety of reasons the 90 day tolling period afforded by § 768.57, Fla.Stat. was either inapplicable to appellant's action or otherwise did not operate to her benefit to overcome the purported untimeliness of her complaint. Without indicating which argument it found convincing, the court granted the hospital's motion and dismissed appellant'scomplaint with prejudice as to the hospital. This dismissal was improper.

Pursuant to § 768.57, Fla.Stat. (1986), any medical malpractice claimant, prior to filing suit, must serve...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Hall by and through Hall v. Daee, 88-1628
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 17 Abril 1990
    ...contrary to the law which requires knowledge of both the incident and the injury to trigger the limitations period. Elliot v. Barrow, 526 So.2d 989 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 536 So.2d 244 (Fla.1988); Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Sitomer, 524 So.2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), rev......
  • Lloyd By and Through Lloyd v. North Broward Hosp. Dist., s. 87-2250
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 10 Julio 1990
    ...the court defined "incident" as "an injury caused by medical malpractice...." Id. at 1081 (emphasis added); accord Elliot v. Barrow, 526 So.2d 989 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 536 So.2d 244 (Fla.1988); Scherer v. Schultz, 468 So.2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Florida Patient's Compensation F......
  • Menendez v. Public Health Trust of Dade County, 89-2332
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 24 Julio 1990
    ...Nardone v. Reynolds, 333 So.2d 25 (Fla.1976); Almengor v. Dade County, 359 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); but see Elliot v. Barrow, 526 So.2d 989 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 536 So.2d 244 (Fla.1988); Schafer v. Lehrer, 476 So.2d 781 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Phillips v. Mease Hosp. & Clinic, 4......
  • Jackson v. Georgopolous, 88-03093
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 4 Octubre 1989
    ...inasmuch as they then had no reason to know of that injury or that the surgery had been negligently performed. See also Elliot v. Barrow, 526 So.2d 989, 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (medical malpractice statute of limitations not triggered by plaintiff's knowledge [or notice] of injury and of in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT