Elliott v. Elliott, 85-1119
| Decision Date | 20 November 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 85-1119,85-1119 |
| Citation | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2575,478 So.2d 509 |
| Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2575 Toni ELLIOTT, Appellant, v. Hugh ELLIOTT, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Joel L. Kirschbaum of Esler & Kirschbaum, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Thomas E. Brandt of the Law Offices of Thomas E. Brandt, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
In proceedings for temporary alimony and child support, the general master took into account interest to be earned by the wife on funds not yet paid to her arising out of settlement of a personal injury action. The trial court erroneously approved this aspect of the master's report. Brinkley v. Brinkley, 453 So.2d 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Davidson v. Davidson, 410 So.2d 943 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 421 So.2d 67 (Fla.1982); McCloskey v. McCloskey, 359 So.2d 494 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), cert. denied, 368 So.2d 1370 (Fla.1979).
We reverse the order of April 18, 1985, and remand to the trial court for a determination of temporary alimony and child support based on appellant's needs and appellee's ability to pay.
The trial court further entered an order on March 1, 1985, upon report of the general master. This order, entered within the ten-day period for filing exceptions, is quashed as violative of rule 1.490(h), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Berkheimer v. Berkheimer, 466 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). See also Plevy v. Plevy, 466 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
REVERSAL; QUASHAL; REMAND.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Villaverde v. Villaverde, s. 88-2003
...potential liability to Medicare. 4 The court should not base alimony or child support on uncertain future events. Elliott v. Elliott, 478 So.2d 509 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Ramsey v. Ramsey, 431 So.2d 258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Henderson v. Henderson, 226 So.2d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA Fourth, we find er......
-
Barnett Bank of Martin County, N.A. v. RGA Development Co.
...time without consideration of timely filed exceptions. See Kay v. Kay, 430 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). See also Elliott v. Elliott, 478 So.2d 509 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Wyman v. Wyman, 430 So.2d 610 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Berk v. Berk, 423 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Nevertheless, the or......
-
Moskowitz v. Moskowitz, 92-2387
...(Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Kay v. Kay, 430 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Cox v. Cox, 490 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Elliott v. Elliott, 478 So.2d 509 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Dembrowski v. Dembrowski, 580 So.2d 897 (Fla. 4th DCA We recognize that this issue appears mooted by the trial court's s......
-
Palmer v. Palmer, 89-2652
...report on October 10, prior to the end of the ten-day period. 1 See Cox v. Cox, 490 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Elliott v. Elliott, 478 So.2d 509 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Berkheimer v. Berkheimer, 466 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Plevy v. Plevy, 466 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA Accordingly, ......