Elliott v. Pac. R.R. Co.
Decision Date | 05 July 1932 |
Docket Number | No. 17509.,17509. |
Citation | 52 S.W.2d 448 |
Parties | CLYDE ELLIOTT, A MINOR, BY DALE ELLIOTT, HIS NEXT FRIEND, APPELLANT, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., RESPONDENT. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cass County. — Hon. Leslie A. Bruce, Judge.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Thos. N. Haynes for appellant.
C.W. Hight, L.J. Bishop and D.C. Chastain for respondent.
Clyde Elliott, eighteen years of age, was driving an automobile in a southeasterly direction along First street in the city of Pleasant Hill about four A.M., of March 22, 1931. Defendant's railroad crossed said street at grade in a general northwesterly and southeasterly direction. The street paving was a concrete slab, and on the crossing a train of dark colored coal cars was permitted by the defendant to remain standing for thirty minutes or more across said street completely blocking all traffic on said street which was extensively used at all hours of the day or night by all kinds of motor and other vehicles as well as by pedestrians. It was very dark and the weather was misty and foggy. With matters in this condition Clyde's automobile coming along the street violently crashed against the cars of said train standing on the crossing, completely wrecking the automobile and seriously injuring its driver.
He, through his father as next friend, brought this suit for $4000 damages. The defendant filed a demurrer to the petition alleging that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The basis of the demurrer, according to the statement in defendant's brief, is "that the petition shows on its face that the plaintiff was guilty of such contributory negligence as to bar recovery."
The trial court sustained the demurrer, whereupon plaintiff appealed.
The petition is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Monforton v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
...raised on the pleadings in the cases of Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Heard, 36 Ga.App. 332, 136 S.E. 533, and Elliott v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co., 227 Mo.App. 225, 52 S.W.2d 448; and a like result was declared where the question arose, as here, on a motion for nonsuit or directed verdict, in ......
-
Dove v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
... ... 164, 115 S.W. 523; ... Schmidt v. Railroad, 191 Mo. 215, 90 S.W. 136; ... Huggart v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 134 Mo. 673, 36 S.W ... 220; Carlson v. A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 187 S.W ... 842; ... Smith v. R. Co., 282 S.W. 62; Stout v. K. C ... Pub. Serv. Co., 17 S.W.2d 363; Elliott v. R ... Co., 52 S.W.2d 448. By the St. Louis Court: Moore v ... R. Co., 157 Mo.App. 53, 137 ... ...
-
Boyd v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 37888
...time to prevent a collision because of such peculiar conditions. Poehler v. Lonsdale, Mo.App. , 129 S.W.2d 59; Elliott v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 227 Mo.App. 225, 52 S.W.2d 448; Roshel v. Litchfield & M. R. Co., Mo.App., 112 S.W.2d 876; Homan v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 334 Mo., 61, 64 S.W.2d 61......
-
Reines v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., 26931.
... ... These five cases are: [195 Wash ... 153] Hofstedt v. Southern Pac. Co., Cal.App. 1 P.2d 470; ... Dickey v. Atlantic C. L. R. Co., 196 N.C. 726, 147 ... 257; ... Richard v. Maine Central R. Co., 132 Me. 197, 168 A ... 811; Elliott v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 227 Mo.App ... 225, 52 S.W.2d 448; Rape v. Tennessee, A. & G. Ry., ... ...