Elliott v. Perez, Civ. A. No. 82-574
Citation | 561 F. Supp. 1325 |
Decision Date | 31 March 1983 |
Docket Number | 82-584.,Civ. A. No. 82-574 |
Parties | James ELLIOTT v. Leander H. PEREZ, Jr., et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana |
Anna E. Dow, Baton Rouge, La., Michael S. Fawer, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs.
Ben C. Toledano, Peter J. Butler, New Orleans, La., for defendants.
This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 1985, et seq., for damages and injunctive relief against two state prosecutors, a State Court Judge, and others, alleging, inter alia, bad faith and malicious prosecution against the Plaintiffs, as well as the improper discharge of a Special Grand Jury, in violation of the Plaintiffs' civil rights. The causes of action alleged by each Plaintiff in this consolidated matter arise out of the following factual situation.
On August 20, 1979, Leander H. Perez, Jr. acting in his capacity as District Attorney for the Parish of Plaquemines, Louisiana, convened a Special Grand Jury to investigate the activities of certain persons in Plaquemines Parish. James Elliott, one of the Plaintiffs in the instant action, was selected as the Grand Jury's foreman. During the course of the Grand Jury's term, Plaintiff, Joseph E. Defley, Jr., appeared as a witness on two occasions.
The term of this Grand Jury was initially for one year, but its term was extended to February 19, 1981. Because the Grand Jury's investigation included the activities of Chalin O. Perez, the brother of the District Attorney, the latter recused himself from any participation in the investigation insofar as it related to or involved his brother, Chalin O. Perez. Twenty Fifth Judicial District Judge Eugene E. Leon, Jr., on October 1, 1980, appointed Giles J. Duplechin, District Attorney ad hoc, in place of the recused District Attorney.
On the evening of February 15, 1981, unbeknownst to representatives of the District Attorney's office, a brown envelope containing numerous copies of a letter of the same date from Joseph E. Defley, Jr. and addressed to James Elliott, along with an attached resolution, was delivered to his home. The letter stated in its entirety:
Yours truly Joseph E. Defley, Jr.
P.S. The purpose of this letter is to serve as a continuation of my testimony; it is not intended for general circulation. I would appreciate your confining its dissemination to those who have a "need to know", as we used to say in the Marine Corps."
Attached to the Defley letter was a Resolution which Defley apparently proposed be adopted by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council, wherein the Council was to require a strict accounting from Delta Development Company, Inc. and various members of the Perez family of all funds received in connection with any sale or lease agreement relating to public lands in Plaquemines Parish. The Resolution was to further require that certain oil companies turn over to the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council all funds which they would otherwise pay to Delta Development Company, Inc., its stockholders or assigns, insofar as said monies represent profits on public lands. Finally, the Resolution would further request that the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Louisiana and the United States Department of Justice take whatever criminal and/or civil action necessary to secure the return of all public lands and monies unlawfully diverted by Delta Development Company, Inc., its shareholders and assigns.
Although it is uncertain how many copies of the letter were delivered to Elliott, on the following morning, Elliott distributed a copy of Defley's letter to each member of the Grand Jury and at no time did Elliott tell either Judge Leon or any legal adviser to the Grand Jury that he had received the letter from Defley.
On February 17, 1981, two days prior to the end of its term, the Grand Jury voted to indict Leander H. Perez, Jr., an officer of Delta Development Company, Inc., for the alleged unlawful taking of $43,000,000.00 in Parish funds, and Delta Development Company, Inc., for the alleged theft of $72,000,000.00 in Parish funds. After the Grand Jury voted the aforementioned indictments, James Elliott, foreman of the Special Grand...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Elliott v. Perez
...JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge: This case concerns the doctrines of judicial and prosecutorial immunity. The District Court, 561 F.Supp. 1325 (E.D.La.1983), dismissed the plaintiffs' claims against a state judge and an assistant district attorney for damages resulting from their acts. We find......
-
Ginter v. Stallcup
...concerned the court in Imbler, 424 U.S. at 423, 96 S.Ct. at 992. See Brooks v. Fitch, 534 F.Supp. 129 (D.N. J.1981) and Elliott v. Perez, 561 F.Supp. 1325 (E.D.La.1983), both of which also involved prosecutors acting with a conflict of This Court is convinced that Beard, Brooks, and Elliott......