Ellis v. Ellis
Decision Date | 13 August 1992 |
Citation | 597 N.E.2d 420,413 Mass. 1003 |
Parties | Gary A. ELLIS v. Delores B. ELLIS. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Rosemarie Haigazian, Edgartown, for Gary A. Ellis.
Albert B. Maggio, Jr., Westford, for Delores B. Ellis.
Before LIACOS, C.J., and WILKINS, NOLAN, LYNCH and O'CONNOR, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
A judge in the Probate and Family Court Department granted the plaintiff a divorce nisi, and temporarily ordered that the Department of Social Services would take legal custody of the defendant mother's child. In a memorandum of decision, the judge found the following facts bearing on questions of custody, visitation, and child support. The parties were married on January 23, 1988. The defendant mother gave birth one month later. The child is named after the plaintiff's grandfather. The plaintiff was present at the birth and is named as the father on the child's birth certificate. However, the parties stipulated that the plaintiff is not the child's biological father and, in fact, the plaintiff did not know the defendant at the probable time of conception. Without finding facts or issuing any orders other than the order of temporary legal custody, the judge reserved and reported to the Appeals Court under G.L. c. 215, § 13 (1990 ed.), the following question: "Can [a Probate and Family Court judge] under current Massachusetts statutes and case law award custody or visits to a non-biological[ly related] plaintiff who arguably established a bond with a child born during the plaintiff's marriage to the biological mother, assuming for the sake of argument that the plaintiff can establish that custody or visits in or with him are in the child's best interest"?
General Laws c. 215, § 13 (1990), provides: This statute is the sole source of authority under which the judge reserved and reported this case, Matter of Jones, 379...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gray v. Commissioner of Revenue
...386 Mass. 136, 138, 434 N.E.2d 1012 (1982), quoting Curran, petitioner, 314 Mass. 91, 94, 49 N.E.2d 432 (1943); Ellis v. Ellis, 413 Mass. 1003, 1004, 597 N.E.2d 420 (1992). Here there was no interlocutory order, and the judge purported to report only one count of a two-count complaint. Ther......
- State Of Ohio v. Mccoy
-
In re Estate of Southwick
...13, and absent interlocutory ruling or order, report must be of entire case or case must be discharged). See also Ellis v. Ellis, 413 Mass. 1003, 1004, 597 N.E.2d 420 (1992) (second sentence of G.L. c. 215, § 13, permits report only where interlocutory order so affects merits of controversy......