Ellison v. Alabama Marble Co.

Decision Date08 October 1931
Docket Number7 Div. 41.
Citation136 So. 787,223 Ala. 371
PartiesELLISON v. ALABAMA MARBLE CO.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Talladega County; W. B. Merrill, Judge.

Action under Homicide Act by H. A. Ellison against the Alabama Marble Company. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

L. H Ellis, of Columbiana, and Ross, Bumgardner, Ross & Ross, of Bessemer, for appellant.

Harrison & Stringer, of Talledega, for appellee.

ANDERSON C.J.

The complaint shows that the deceased child was no more than a trespasser or mere licensee, was, at most, upon the defendant's premises by bare sufferance.

"It is a principle of law, founded on reason as well as authorities, that where a landowner suffers persons to cross his lands without any express or implied invitation on his part, and such person wanders out of the beaten paths and falls into a pit, the landowner is without fault or blame and cannot be made liable in damages." Louisville &amp N. R. Co. v. Sides, 129 Ala. 399, 29 So. 798, 799.

Nor did the fact that people, including children, were in the habit of congregating and playing upon the premises upon which the hole was located, and traveled a path near said hole, with the knowledge of the defendant, amount to an implied invitation on the part of the defendant. Cox v. Alabama Water Co. 216 Ala. 35, 112 So. 352, 53 A. L. R. 1336; Alabama G. S. Railway Co. v. Godfrey, 156 Ala. 219 47 So. 185, 130 Am. St. Rep. 76; Scoggins v. Atlantic & G. P. Cement Co., 179 Ala. 222, 60 So. 175.

"Mere toleration of trespassers does not of itself alter the status of trespassers." 45 C.J. 740. The complaint did not set out such a duty owing to the deceased as to bring him within the protection of the conduct charged against the defendant, and the trial court did not err in sustaining the defendant's demurrer to each count of the complaint.

It is urged, in brief of appellant's counsel, that while the defendant may have had the right to do or permit the things charged on its own premises, that it had no right to do so on the premises of another without being answerable in damages to third persons who are thereby injured. In other words, the brief states; "As to Counts 3, A and B of the complaint these counts, as we have already stated, are drawn on the theory that the hole into which this child fell and was drowned was upon land belonging to some person other than this defendant but that it...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Maher v. City of Casper
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1950
    ...or the plaintiff was nonsuited or in which recovery was denied on the principle enunciated in the foregoing cases. Ellison v. Alabama Marble Co., 223 Ala. 371, 136 So. 787; Clark v. City of Manchester, 62 N.H. 577, 580; Bottum's Adm'r v. Hawks, 84 Vt. 370, 79 A. 858, 35 L.R.A., N.S., 440, A......
  • Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Zeidler, 6 Div. 935
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • November 19, 1936
    ... ... to children, and to be and remain upon their premises in said ... city of Birmingham, Alabama, in such condition as to be ... dangerous to children under the age of 8 years, and the ... 328, 124 So. 892; Birmingham Amusements, Inc., ... v. Turner, 221 Ala. 242, 128 So. 211; Ellison v ... Alabama Marble Co., 223 Ala. 371, 136 So. 787; ... Needham v. Birmingham Trussville Iron ... ...
  • Preston v. LaSalle Apartments
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1941
    ... ... 78, 69 So. 131, ... L.R.A.1916A, 510; Gandy v. Copeland, 204 Ala. 366, ... 86 So. 3; Alabama By-Products Corp. v. Cosby, 217 ... Ala. 144, 115 So. 31; Stephens v. Walker, 217 Ala ... 466, ... 892; Birmingham ... Amusements, Inc. v. Turner, 221 Ala. 242, 128 So. 211; ... Ellison v. Alabama Marble Co., 223 Ala. 371, 136 So ... 787; Needham v. Birmingham Trusville Iron Co., ... ...
  • Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Green
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 16, 1964
    ...Water Co., 216 Ala. 35, 112 So. 352, 53 A.L.R. 1336; Eades v. American Cast-Iron Pipe Co., 208 Ala. 556, 94 So. 593; Ellison v. Alabama Marble Co., 223 Ala. 371, 136 So. 787; Athey v. Tenn. Coal, Iron & R. Co., 191 Ala. 646, 68 So. 154. See, also, W. F. Bradley Lumber Co. v. Crowell, 178 So......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT