Elsberry v. Sexton
Decision Date | 14 February 1911 |
Citation | 54 So. 592,61 Fla. 162 |
Parties | ELSBERRY v. SEXTON. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Error to Circuit Court, Jackson County; J. Emmet Wolfe, Judge.
Action by L. P. Sexton against G. H. Elsberry. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed and remanded with directions.
Syllabus by the Court
A sale of standing timber is a contract concerning an interest in land within the meaning of the statute of frauds (section 2517, General Statutes of 1906), which forbids the bringing of any action whereby to charge any person upon any contract for the sale of lands, tenements, or hereditaments, or of any uncertain interest in or concerning them, unless the agreement or promise upon which such action shall be brought or some note or memorandum thereof, shall be in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or by some other person by him thereunto lawfully authorized. Under this statute, where a contract is for the sale of land, or any interest therein, and is not in writing, no action at law can ever be maintained upon it. Part performance of such a contract is a ground of relief in equity only, and there on the principle of relieving from fraud.
COUNSEL Price & Lewis, for plaintiff in error.
C. L. Wilson, for defendant in error.
The defendant in error as plaintiff below sued the plaintiff in error as defendant below in the circuit court of Jackson county in an action of assumpsit at law, and recovered judgment which the defendant below brings here for review by writ of error. The declaration in the case alleged as follows:
To this declaration the defendant interposed a demurrer upon the following grounds, among others:
'(2) That said contract set up and declared upon by said declaration and each count thereof is void under the statute of frauds.
'(3) That it is apparent from the allegations...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Collier v. Brooks
...contract for the purchase of an interest in realty, which action is expressly forbidden by our statute of frauds. Elsberry v. Sexton, 61 Fla. 162, 54 So. 592, 593 (Fla.1911) (cites omitted). And in Canell v. Arcola Housing Corp., 65 So.2d 849, 851 (Fla.1953), which involved an oral promise ......
-
RANKIN v. RIDGE
...487, 51 S.W. 101; Walton v. Lowrey, 74 Miss. 484, 21 So. 243; Griffith v. Ayer-Lord Tie Co., 109 Ark. 223, 159 S.W. 218; Elsberry v. Sexton, 61 Fla. 162, 54 So. 592; Burkitt v. Wynne, 62 Tex.Civ.App. 560, 132 S.W. 816; Miller v. Smith, 202 Ala. 449, 80 So. 833; Schaap v. Wolf, 173 Wis. 351,......
-
White Const. Co. v. Martin Marietta Materials
...only when a plaintiff seeks purely equitable relief." Eclipse Medical, Inc., 262 F.Supp.2d at 1346, n. 6 (citing Elsberry v. Sexton, 61 Fla. 162, 54 So. 592 (1911)); LynkUs Communications, 965 So.2d at 1166 ("the doctrine of part performance does not apply to actions for the recovery of dam......
-
Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Pickard
...oral promise concerning an easement in land--the ownership of which is not alleged nor the location or description given.' Elsberry v. Sexton, 61 Fla. 162, 54 So. 592; Williams v. Faile, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 599; Neveils v. Thagard, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 495, However, in the case sub j......