Emam v. Cmty. Action P'ship of Ramsey

• Citation: 970 N.W.2d 71 (Mem)
• Decision Date: 17 February 2022
• Docket Number: A21-1261
• Parties: Fatuma EMAM, Relator, v. COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF RAMSEY and SFM Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.
• Court: Supreme Court of Minnesota (US)

970 N.W.2d 71 (Mem)

Fatuma EMAM, Relator,

v.COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF RAMSEY and SFM Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.

A21-1261

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 17, 2022

Fatuma Emam, Coon Rapids, Minnesota, pro se.

Thomas P. Davern, Lynn, Scharfenberg and Hollick, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 1, 2021, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that summary affirmances lack precedential value "because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," and because they "do no more than establish the law of the case").

BY THE COURT:

/s/

Associate Justice