Emc Mortgage Corporation v. Stewart, 2002-06036.
Decision Date | 29 December 2003 |
Docket Number | 2002-06036.,2003-03923. |
Citation | 769 N.Y.S.2d 408,2 A.D.3d 772,2003 NY Slip Op 19956 |
Parties | EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Respondent, v. STANLEY STEWART, Appellant, et al., Defendants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.
The appellant's cross motion, denominated as one for leave to renew or reargue the plaintiff's prior motion, was not based on new facts which were unavailable at the time of the original motion, and therefore the motion was, in effect, one for reargument, the denial of which is not appealable (see Reyes v Ross, 289 AD2d 554, 555 [2001]; Duffy v Wetzler, 260 AD2d 596, 597 [1999]).
Contrary to the appellant's contentions, in response to the plaintiff's prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, he failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact. The appellant's pleadings not only raised no valid defenses, but acknowledged the default and debt owed. It is well settled that once a mortgagor defaults on loan payments, a mortgagee is not required to accept less than the full repayment as demanded (see First Fed. Sav. Bank v Midura, 264 AD2d 407 [1999]; Home Sav. of Am., FSB v Isaacson, 240 AD2d 633 [1...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
VFC Partners 19, LLC v. Romaz Props., Ltd.
...due under a mortgage note that has matured or has been accelerated following a default in payment (see EMC Mtge. Corp. v. Stewart, 2 AD3d 772, 769 N.Y.S.2d 408 [2d Dept 2003] ; First Federal Sav. Bank v. Midura, 264 A.D.2d 407, 694 N.Y.S.2d 121 [2d Dept 1999] ). Hudson Valley's rejection of......
-
Carver Fed. Sav. Bank v. Redeemed Christian Church of God, Int'l Chapel, HHH Parish, Long Island, N.Y., Inc.
...on loan payments, a mortgagee is not required to accept less than the full repayment as demanded ( see EMC Mtge. Corp. v. Stewart, 2 A.D.3d 772, 769 N.Y.S.2d 408 [2d Dept 2003]; First Federal Sav. Bank v. Midura, 264 A.D.2d 407, 694 N.Y.S.2d 121 [2d Dept 1999] ). It is equally well establis......
-
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Arthur
...default in payment (see, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Van Dyke, 101 AD3d 638, 958 N.Y.S.2d 331 [1st Dept 2012] ; EMC Mtge. Corp. v. Stewart, 2 AD3d 772, 769 N.Y.S.2d 408 [2d Dept 2003] ; United Cos. Lending Corp. v. Hingos, 283 A.D.2d 764, 724 N.Y.S.2d 134 [3d Dept 2001] ; First Fed. Sav. Bank......
-
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Holler
...433 [2d Dept 2014] ; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Van Dyke, 101 A.D.3d 638, 958 N.Y.S.2d 331 [1st Dept 2012] ; EMC Mtge. Corp. v. Stewart, 2 A.D.3d 772, 769 N.Y.S.2d 408 [2d Dept 2003] ; United Cos. Lending Corp. v. Hingos, 283 A.D.2d 764, 724 N.Y.S.2d 134 [3d Dept 2001] ; First Fed. Sav. Bank......