Eminent Household of Columbian v. Lundy

Decision Date13 March 1916
CitationEminent Household of Columbian v. Lundy, 71 So. 16, 110 Miss. 881 (Miss. 1916)
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesEMINENT HOUSEHOLD OF COLUMBIAN v. LUNDY

March 1916

APPEAL from the circuit court of Neshoba county, HON. C. L. DOBBS Judge.

Suit by Slocum Lundy against the Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen. Default judgment for plaintiff and defendant brought certiorari to circuit court wherein judgment was rendered for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

On April 20, 1912, appellee brought suit in the court of a justice of the peace of Neshoba county against appellant for the sum of one hundred dollars. A summons was issued directed to appellee, and on April 24th the constable made the following return:

"I have this day executed the within writ by delivering to J. F Guthrie, consul commander, and to Melton Lundy, agents and representatives of defendant, whose place of business is in Neshoba county, Miss., district No. 1 thereof, a true copy of this writ."

On May 1st, the return day of the court, a judgment by default was rendered against appellant. No notice was given appellant by the justice of the peace, and no copy of the summons mailed to him as directed by section 920 of the Code of 1906.

After the time for an appeal to the circuit court had elapsed appellant learned of this judgment, and filed its petition in the circuit court asking for a writ of certiorari. The record was brought up, and on the hearing before the court, a jury being waived, a judgment was rendered against the appellant from which an appeal is taken.

Section 920 of the Code is as follows:

"920. Process may be Served upon Agent.--Process may be served upon an agent of said corporation found within the county where the suit is brought, no matter what character of agent such person may be; and in the absence of an agent, it shall...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Agnew
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • May 28, 1934
    ... ... Miss. 610, 52 So. 629; Eminent Household of Columbia Woodmen ... v. Lundy, 110 Miss. 881, 71 So. 16 ... ...
  • National Surety Co. v. Board of Supr's Holmes County
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 27, 1919
    ... ... cases cited in our original brief. Eminent Household of ... Columbian v. Lundy, 110 Miss. 881, s. c. 71 So. 16; ... ...
  • National Bank of Greece v. Savarika
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1933
    ... ... Hedgpeth, 112 So. 874; Eminent Household of ... Columbian Woodmen v. Lundy, 71 So. 16; Belt v ... ...
  • Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. Gomillion
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 3, 1927
    ... ... itself is conclusive of the invalidity of the decree ... Eminent Household, etc., v. Lundy, 110 Miss. 861, 71 ... III ... The ... Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Lundy, 110 ... Miss. 881, 71 So. 16, is authority for the ... ...
  • Get Started for Free