Emmetsburg Ready Mix Co. v. Norris

Decision Date13 February 1985
Docket NumberNo. 83-461,83-461
Citation362 N.W.2d 498
PartiesEMMETSBURG READY MIX CO., d/b/a Clay County Concrete, Appellant, v. G. Kennon NORRIS and Margaret M. Norris, Husband and Wife, Individually, and as Partners in 18 Norris Place, an Iowa Partnership, Appellees.
CourtIowa Supreme Court

Donald J. Bormann of Doran & Bormann, Emmetsburg, and Redge O. Berg, Spencer, for appellant.

David A. Scott of Cornwall, Avery, Bjornstad & Scott, Spencer, for appellees.

Considered en banc.

REYNOLDSON, Chief Justice.

The fighting issue in this case is whether the statutory thirty days' time (following statutory notice) granted a mechanic's lienholder for bringing an action to enforce the lien can be narrowed to twenty-nine days when the courthouse is locked on the thirtieth day for a declared holiday.

The operative facts are few. Plaintiff Emmetsburg Ready Mix Co. (Ready Mix) filed a mechanic's lien against real estate owned by defendants G. Kennon and Margaret M. Norris (Norris). Norris served Ready Mix with an Iowa Code section 572.28 1 demand to bring suit within thirty days. These parties agree that the thirtieth day fell on Friday, December 24, 1982. When Ready Mix went to file its action on that day it found the courthouse locked in observance of the Christmas holiday. The action thus was filed on the next business day, Monday, December 27, 1982. Norris filed a special appearance seeking dismissal of the Ready Mix petition on the ground it had not been filed within the statutory thirty-day period. Ready Mix resisted the special appearance. District court dismissed the action and Ready Mix has filed a timely appeal. We reverse and remand.

I. Norris asserts a proper interpretation of three Code sections mandates the result reached by the district court.

Iowa Code section 4.1 states in relevant part:

In the construction of the statutes, the following rules shall be observed, unless such construction would be inconsistent with the manifest intent of the general assembly, or repugnant to the context of the statute:

....

22. Computing time--legal holidays. In computing time, the first day shall be excluded and the last included, unless the last falls on Sunday, in which case the time prescribed shall be extended so as to include the whole of the following Monday, provided that, whenever by the provisions of any statute or rule prescribed under authority of a statute, the last day for the commencement of any action or proceedings, the filing of any pleading or motion in a pending action or proceedings or the perfecting or filing of any appeal from the decision or award of any court, board, commission or official falls on a Saturday, a Sunday, the first day of January, the twelfth day of February, the third Monday in February, the last Monday in May, the fourth day of July, the first Monday in September, the eleventh day of November, the fourth Thursday in November, the twenty-fifth day of December, and the following Monday whenever any of the foregoing named legal holidays may fall on a Sunday, and any day appointed or recommended by the governor of Iowa or the president of the United States as a day of fasting or thanksgiving, the time therefor shall be extended to include the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or such day hereinbefore enumerated.

Iowa Code section 33.1 provides:

Legal public holidays. The following are legal public holidays:

1. New Year's Day, January 1.

2. Lincoln's Birthday, February 12.

3. Washington's Birthday, the third Monday in February.

4. Memorial Day, the last Monday in May.

5. Independence Day, July 4.

6. Labor Day, the first Monday in September.

7. Veterans Day, November 11.

8. Thanksgiving Day, the fourth Thursday in November.

9. Christmas Day, December 25.

Iowa Code section 617.8 provides:

Holidays. No person shall be held to answer or appear in any court on any day now or hereafter made a legal holiday.

Norris asserts these statutes are plain and unambiguous. Because December 24, 1982, was not an enumerated legal holiday, the Iowa Code section 572.28 thirty-day period could not be extended.

Ready Mix argues such an interpretation of the statutes is strained, and leads to absurd consequences. It points to the provisions of Iowa Code sections 4.4 ("In enacting a statute, it is presumed that ... [a] just and reasonable result is intended."), and 4.6 ("If a statute is ambiguous, the court, in determining the intention of the legislature, may consider ... [t]he object sought to be obtained ... [and] ... [t]he consequences of a particular construction.").

Iowa Code section 33.2 ("Paid holidays") sheds further light on legislative intent:

If a holiday enumerated in this section falls on Saturday, the preceding Friday shall be granted and if a holiday enumerated in this section falls on Sunday, the following Monday shall be granted.

It would seem more than passing strange that the general assembly would deprive a litigant of a statutory right as a result of a courthouse being closed on a day all state employees, by statutory mandate, were enjoying a paid holiday.

Our decisions establish the rule that "[t]he goal in construing statutes is to ascertain legislative intent. ... The spirit of the statute must be considered as well as the words. ... A sensible, workable, practical, and logical construction should be given. ... Inconvenience or absurdity should be avoided." Hansen v. State, 298 N.W.2d 263, 265-66 (Iowa 1980). See also Brandon v. Roy, 147 N.W.2d 810, 813 (Iowa 1967); Janson v. Fulton, 162 N.W.2d 438, 442-43 (Iowa 1968). The legislature has cautioned that the Code's "provisions and all proceedings under it shall be liberally construed with a view to promote its objects and assist the parties in obtaining justice." Iowa Code § 4.2.

II. Pettigrove v. Parro Construction Corp., 44 Ill.App.2d 421, 194 N.E.2d 521 (1963), presents facts similar to the case before us. In Pettigrove, plaintiff's cause was dismissed for failure to prosecute. The final day for filing a motion to reinstate fell on a Saturday, when the clerk's office was closed. The following Monday was a legal...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Probasco v. Iowa Civil Rights Com'n, HY-VEE
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • March 16, 1988
    ...of various interpretation. Kifer v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 777 F.2d 1325, 1332 (8th Cir.1985); see Emmetsburg Ready Mix Co. v. Norris, 362 N.W.2d 498, 499 (Iowa 1985). In order to determine and effectuate legislative intent, a statute must be considered in its entirety. Kifer, 777 F.2d at 1......
  • Cole v. State, 84-1401
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • October 16, 1985
    ...practical, and logical construction should be given .... Inconvenience or absurdity should be avoided." Emmetsburg Ready Mix Co. v. Norris, 362 N.W.2d 498, 499 (Iowa 1985) (quoting Hansen v. State, 298 N.W.2d 263, 265-66 (Iowa 1980)). With these principles of statutory construction before u......
  • State v. Wright, 87-1347
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • May 17, 1989
    ...consider the spirit of the statute as well as the words so that a practical and logical construction is given. Emmetsburg Ready Mix Co. v. Norris, 362 N.W.2d 498, 499 (Iowa 1985); Hansen v. State, 298 N.W.2d 263, 265-66 (Iowa 1980). The words of the statute are given their ordinary meaning ......
  • State v. Collier
    • United States
    • Iowa Court of Appeals
    • May 28, 1985
    ...is to ascertain legislative intent, considering the spirit of the statute as well as the words themselves. Emmetsburg Ready Mix Co. v. Norris, 362 N.W.2d 498, 499 (Iowa 1985). A sensible, workable, practical, and logical construction should be given, avoiding inconvenience or absurdity. Id.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT