Emmons v. Gordon
Decision Date | 06 July 1897 |
Parties | Emmons, Administrator, Appellant, v. Gordon et al |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Audrain Circuit Court. -- Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge.
Affirmed.
W. W Fry for appellants.
(1) The form of the bond is merely directory and can not be avoided because the form of the statute has been disregarded. Hicks v. Chouteau, 12 Mo. 342; Hall v Cushing, 26 Mass. 395. (2) By the will the executor is directed to sell all of his real estate, wherever situated, and pay his debts, etc. In selling the Texas land the executor was "executing the will" as executor and he and his bondsmen are undoubtedly liable for the proceeds of the sale. (3) Although the general principle is that the realty descends to the heir, yet when an executor is authorized by the will to sell the real estate and execute deed to convey the title to the same and he exercises the authority he is liable on his bond as executor if he fails to account for the proceeds. Dix v. Morris, 66 Mo. 514; Lewis v. Carson, 93 Mo. 587. A will giving power of sale vests the title in the executor at the time of the testators' death, and his deed of the property is a good conveyance. Here the distinction between an executor and administrator is drawn. Wilson v. Wilson, 54 Mo. 213; Bambrick v. Webster Gr. Ch., 53 Mo.App. 234. (4) As executor he is responsible and his sureties liable for all assets, obtained in whatever State, by virtue of the will. Hooper v. Hooper, 29 W.Va. 276; 2 Woerner on Administration, sec. 537; Pipkin v. Casey, 13 Mo. 347. An executor is chargeable with all property of the estate coming to his hands, no matter from what source derived. Scudder v. Ames, 89 Mo. 496; Shouler on Executors, sec. 175, p. 236; Gamble v. Gibson, 59 Mo. 585; Lewis v. Carson, 93 Mo. 587; State to use v. Scholl, 47 Mo. 84. (5) An executor can not allege his own wrong to shield himself from liability. Hartnett v. Fegan, 3 Mo.App. 1; Pipkin v. Casey, 13 Mo. 347.
George Robertson for respondents.
(1) This being a statutory action it can be maintained only against the principal and sureties upon the bond. Any order and judgment can only be enforced "against the executor and his sureties." R. S. 1889, sec. 48. (2) The probate court has no jurisdiction over the trust items. All items as to rent should be stricken from the settlements. Nichols v. Reyburn, 55 Mo.App. 1; Coal Co. v. Slevin, 56 Mo.App. 107; In re Rickenbaugh, 42 Mo.App. 328. (3) The Texas land items should be stricken from the settlements. Lewis v. Carson, 93 Mo. 587; McPike v. McPike, 111 Mo. 216; Church v. Robberson, 71 Mo. 338; Scudder v. Ames, 89 Mo. 522.
OPINION
In Banc.
-- This proceeding was begun in the probate court of Audrain county under section 48, Revised Statutes 1889, to compel the defendant Gordon, as executor of the last will and testament of J. J. West, deceased, to account with the plaintiff as administrator de bonis non with the will annexed of said deceased, and for judgment against said Gordon and his securities and the heirs of William M. Sims one of the sureties now deceased on his bond as such executor. The case went by appeal from the probate to the circuit court of Audrain county.
J. J. West, deceased, died testate. His will is as follows: "Know all men by these presents, that I, Jeremiah J. West, of the county of Audrain and State of Missouri, do make and publish this, my last will and testament.
John M. Gordon qualified as executor and as such executed bond as follows:
William M. Sims died some time prior to May 25, 1885, leaving a will which was duly probated on that day in the probate court of Audrain county. Final settlement of his estate was made September 15, 1887. Mrs. Potts and Mrs. Clark were the only heirs of Sims, who with their husbands, J. A. Potts and C. F. Clark, are made defendants. The proceedings were dismissed as to C. T. Black, in the probate court on the twenty-third day of February, 1891. At the September term, 1895, of the Audrain circuit court the death of John M. Gordon was suggested of record, and the suit revived against the defendant Robert Luckie as his administrator, who entered his voluntary appearance.
At the time of West's decease he was the owner of a large personal estate and several tracts of land in the State of Missouri, and several large tracts of land in the State of Texas. Gordon sold the lands in Texas under the power conferred upon him by the will as executor, and as such received the purchase money and executed deeds therefor.
The trial court, in passing upon the case and in rendering judgment, said: The court then rendered the following judgment:
To estate of J. J. West, deceased.
To continue reading
Request your trial