Employers Self Insurers Fund and Claims Center v. Torres, 89-2970

Decision Date09 August 1990
Docket NumberNo. 89-2970,89-2970
Parties15 Fla. L. Weekly D2075 EMPLOYERS SELF INSURERS FUND AND CLAIMS CENTER, Appellant, v. Manuel TORRES, et al., Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

William H. Lore of Joseph E. Smith, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Longwood; Edward H. Hurt and Hillarey McCall, Orlando, for appellee Torres; James H. Smith of Marlow, Shofi, Smith, Hennen, Smith & Jenkins, P.A., Tampa, for appellees Right-O-Way, Inc. and Home Ins. Co.

WOLF, Judge.

This is an appeal from a workers' compensation order requiring Employers Self Insurance Fund to pay benefits to claimant, Manuel Torres, and dismissing the claim for benefits against Right-O-Way, Inc.

The issue is whether the appellant, Employers Self Insurance Fund (hereinafter ESIF) effectively cancelled its workers' compensation coverage and was, thus, not at risk for claimant's injury. We find that the cancellation was not effective and, therefore, affirm.

On March 6, 1987, Florida Air Freight Co., Inc., employer, applied to Employers Self Insurers Fund (ESIF) for workers' compensation insurance and to Florida Employers Safety Association (Safety Association) for membership. ESIF required that its insureds be members of the Safety Association, and the Safety Association required the payment of dues. Both ESIF and the Safety Association accepted employer's application.

ESIF subsequently filed a notice of termination of employer's workers' compensation insurance due to employer's failure to pay Safety Association dues ($50). The notice of termination was dated March 4, 1988, but was postmarked March 7, 1988, and it stated that termination of the coverage would be effective April 4, 1988. The Division of Workers' Compensation received the notice of termination on March 8, 1988, and stamped it as recorded on April 7, 1988, which indicated its determination that the effective date of termination was April 7, 1988. This date was based on a calculation of 30 days from the date of the postmark.

On April 8, 1988, Manuel Torres, claimant, was injured while unloading freight that had been forwarded to employer's facility by Right-O-Way, Inc., a freight forwarder. Claimant hired an attorney who filed a claim for benefits against employer. Claimant subsequently filed an amended claim for benefits naming Right-O-Way, Inc. as an additional statutory employer. Employer took the position that its workers' compensation insurance coverage through ESIF was still in effect on the date of the accident because the insurance coverage was ineffectively and improperly denied and canceled. Right-O-Way's position was that it was not a general contractor and, therefore, not a statutory employer.

On September 25, 1989, the judge of compensation claims entered an order finding that ESIF did not give 30 days' notice of cancellation of insurance coverage required pursuant to § 440.42(2), Fla.Stat. Due to the improper notice of cancellation, the judge found that employer was a member of the Safety Association and insured through ESIF on April 8, 1988, and further found the question of the contractual relationship between employer and Right-O-Way moot.

The issue presented here is whether a notice of termination of workers' compensation insurance coverage that is postmarked March 7, 1988, and states that coverage will be terminated on April 4, 1988, is void because it does not comply with the 30-day notice requirement set out in §§ 440.42(2) and 440.185(7), Fla.Stat. (1987), and Rule 38 F-6.008(1), F.A.C., or whether coverage continues until 30 days after the postmark date at which time it terminates, despite the earlier stated date of termination.

Sec. 440.42(2), Fla.Stat. (1987), states, in pertinent part:

No contract or policy of insurance issued by a carrier under this chapter shall expire or be canceled until at least 30 days have elapsed after a notice of cancellation has been sent to the division and to the employer in accordance with the provisions of subsection 440.185(7).

Sec. 440.185(7), Fla.Stat., (1987), in pertinent part, states:

Notice of cancellation or expiration of a policy as set out in s. 440.42(2) shall be mailed to the division in accordance...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Curtis-Hale, Inc. v. Geltz, CURTIS-HAL
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 4, 1992
    ...notice failed to meet the requirements set forth in the statutes and rule governing WC policy cancellation. Employers Self Insurers Fund v. Torres, 565 So.2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Young v. Travelers Insur. Co., 496 So.2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Peninsular Fire Insur. Co. v. King, 282 So......
  • Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Piccolo, 92-2697
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 27, 1993
    ...appellant. Alexander G. Paderewski of Paderewski & Sweeting, P.A., Sarasota, for appellee. PER CURIAM. See Employers Self Insurers Fund v. Torres, 565 So.2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA1990). ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT