Energy Air & Amerisure Ins. Co. v. Lalonde, 1D13–5213.

Decision Date24 April 2014
Docket NumberNo. 1D13–5213.,1D13–5213.
Citation135 So.3d 1090
PartiesENERGY AIR AND AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellants, v. Ronald LALONDE, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. W. James Condry, II, Judge.

Wayne Johnson of DeCiccio & Johnson, Winter Park, for Appellants.

Nicholas A. Shannin of the Shannin Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this workers' compensation case, the Employer/Carrier (E/C) appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) finding Claimant's heat exhaustion injury compensable and awarding past medical bills. The E/C argues that the JCC erred both in finding compensability of the heat exposure injury in the absence of evidence that Claimant “was exposed to dangers materially in excess to which the community is exposed,” and in awarding the past medical bills in the absence of evidence that they were related to Claimant's heat exhaustion. We affirm on both points, and write solely to confirm that prior court-created causation standards are superseded by the Legislature's adoption of the “major contributing cause” standard effective January 1, 1994, see sections 440.09(1) & 440.02(36), Florida Statutes (2012), and to restate that diagnostic tests are compensable if they are “reasonably necessary to determine whether the industrial accident was the cause of” Claimant's injuries, see Grainger v. Indian River Transport, 869 So.2d 1269, 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Silberberg v. Palm Beach Cnty. Sch. Bd.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 16, 2022
    ...This statutory addition of the MCC standard "superseded" what had been "prior court-created causation standards." Energy Air v. Lalonde , 135 So. 3d 1090 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) ; see also Vigliotti v. K-mart Corp. , 680 So. 2d 466, 468 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (noting that the Legislature intended ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT